Holonic Multiagent Systems — Theory and Applications —

  • Klaus Fischer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1695)

Abstract

With the ever growing usage of the world wide IT networks, agent technologies and multiagent systems (MAS) are attracting more and more attention. Multiagent systems are designed to be open systems, wheras agent technologies aim at the design of agents that perform well in environments that are not necessarily well-structured and benevolent. Emergent system behaviour is one of the most interesting phenomena one can investigate in MAS. However, there is more to MAS design than the interaction between a number of agents. For an effective system behaviour we need structure and organisation. This paper presents basic concepts of a theory for holonic multiagent systems with the aim to define the building blocks of a theory that can explain organisation and dynamic reorganisation in MAS. In doing so it tries to bridge the well-known micro-macro gap in MAS theories. The basic concepts are illustrated with three application scenarios: flexible manufacturing, order dispatching in haulage companies, and train coupling and sharing.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Bachem, W. Hochstättler, and M. Malich. Simulated trading: A new approach for solving vehicle routing problems. Technical Report 92.125, Mathematisches Institut der Universität zu Köln, December 1992.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luc Bongaerts, László Monostori, Duncan Mc Farlane, and Botond Kádár. Hierarchy in distributed shop floor control. In IMS-EUROPE 1998, the First Open Workshop of Esprit Working group on IMS, Lausanne, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H.-J. Bürckert, K. Fischer, and G. Vierke. Transportation Scheduling with Holonic MAS — The TeleTruck Approach. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Practical Applications of Intelligent Agents and Multiagents (PAAM’98), 1998.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L Cavedon and G. Tidhar. A logical framework for modelling multi-agent systems and joint attitudes. Technical Report 66, Australian Artificial Intelligence Institute, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Christensen. Holonic Manufacturing Systems — Initial Architecture and Standard Directions. In Proc. of the 1st European Conference on Holonic Manufacturing Systems, Hannover, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Davis and R. G. Smith. Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 20:63–109, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Fagin, J. Y. Halpern, Y. Moses, and M. Y. Vardi. Reasoning About Knowledge. MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Fischer, J. P. Müller, and M. Pischel. A Model for Cooperative Transportation Scheduling. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Multiagent Systems (ICMAS’95), pages 109–116, San Francisco, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Fischer, J. P. Müller, and M. Pischel. Cooperative transportation scheduling: an application domain for DAI. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence. Special issue on Intelligent Agents, 10(1), 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Kinny, M. Ljungberg, A. S. Rao, E. Sonenberg, G. Tidhar, and E. Werner. Planned Team Activity. In C. Castelfranchi and E. Werner, editors, Artificial Social Systems — Selected Papers from the Fourth European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, MAAMAW-92, number 830 in LNAI, pages 226–256. Springer-Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Koestler. The Ghost in the Machine. Arkana Books, 1989.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Lind, K. Fischer, J. Böcker, and B. Zierkler. Transportation Scheduling and Simulation in a Railroad Scenario: A Multi-Agent Approach. In Proc. of the 4th int. Conf. on The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology, pages 325–344. The Practical Application Company Ltd, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. A. Simon. The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, 6th edition, 1990.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. P. Singh. Commitments Among Autonomous Agents in Information-Rich Environments. In Proceedings of the 8th European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World (MAAMAW), 1997.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hans-Jürgen Warnecke. Aufbruch zum fraktalen Unternehmen — Praxisbeispiele für neues Denken und Handeln. Springer-Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Fischer
    • 1
  1. 1.DFKI GmbHSaarbrücken

Personalised recommendations