Advertisement

Representing Scholarly Claims in Internet Digital Libraries: A Knowledge Modelling Approach

  • Simon Buckingham Shum
  • Enrico Motta
  • John Domingue
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1696)

Abstract

This paper is concerned with tracking and interpreting scholarly documents in distributed research communities. We argue that current approaches to document description, and current technological infrastructures particularly over the World Wide Web, provide poor support for these tasks. We describe the design of a digital library server which will enable authors to submit a summary of the contributions they claim their documents makes, and its relations to the literature. We describe a knowledge-based Web environment to support the emergence of such a community-constructed semantic hypertext, and the services it could provide to assist the interpretation of an idea or document in the context of its literature. The discussion considers in detail how the approach addresses usability issues associated with knowledge structuring environments.

Keywords

Digital Library Resource Description Framework Semantic Network Knowledge Modelling Scholarly Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allan, J. Automatic Hypertext Link Typing. In Proc. Hypertext’96, 1996, ACM Press: NY, pp. 42–52Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benjamins, V.R. and Fensel, D. Community is Knowledge in (KA)2. In Proc. KAW’98: 11th Banff Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, Banff, Canada, 1998, Dept. Computer Science, University of Calgary, CA <http://www.aifb.unikarlsruhe.de/WBS/broker/KA2.html>Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benjamins, V.R. and Fensel, D. Special Issue on Problem Solving Methods (Eds.). International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49,4, 1998Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bieber, M., Vitali, F., Ashman, H., Balasubramanian, V. and Oinas-Kukkonen, H. Fourth Generation Hypermedia: Some Missing Links for the World Wide Web. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, World Wide Web Usability Special Issue, (Eds.) S. Buckingham Shum & C. McKnight, 47,1, 1997, pp. 31–65Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buckingham Shum, S. Design Argumentation as Design Rationale. The Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology (Marcel Dekker Inc: NY), 35,20, 1996, pp. 95–128Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buckingham Shum, S. Negotiating the Construction and Reconstruction of Organisational Memories. Journal of Universal Computer Science (Special Issue on Information Technology for Knowledge Management), 3,8, 1997, pp. 899–928 <http://www.iicm.edu/jucs_3_8/>Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buckingham Shum, S. and Hammond, N. Argumentation-Based Design Rationale: What Use at What Cost? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40,4, 1994, pp. 603–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buckingham Shum, S., MacLean, A., Bellotti, V. and Hammond, N. Graphical Argumentation and Design Cognition. Human-Computer Interaction, 12,3, 1997, pp. 267–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buckingham Shum, S. and Sumner, T. New Scenarios in Scholarly Publishing and Debate. In The Knowledge Web: Learning and Collaborating on the Net, Eisenstadt, M. and Vincent, T., (Ed.), Kogan Page: London, 1998, pp. 135–151 <http://kmi.open.ac.uk/knowledgeweb>Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bunge, M.A. Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 3. Ontology I: The Furniture of the World. Reidel: Boston, 1977zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, C. and Carr, L. Trailblazing the Literature of Hypertext: Author Co-Citation Analysis (1989–1998). In Proceedings of Hypertext’99: 10th ACM Conference on Hypertext, Darmstadt (21–25 Feb.), 1999, ACM Press: New York, pp. 51–60 <http://www.brunel.ac.uk/~cssrccc2/papers/ht99.pdf>Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen, C. and Czerwinski, M. From Latent Semantics to Spatial Hypermedia: An Integrated Approach. In Proceedings of Hypertext–98: 9th ACM Conference on Hypertext, Pittsburgh, 1998, ACM Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D3E: Digital Document Discourse Environment (D3E). Knowledge Media Institute, Open University <http://d3e.open.ac.uk>
  14. 14.
    Domingue, J. Tadzebao and WebOnto: Discussing, Browsing, and Editing Ontologies on the Web. In Proc. KAW–98: 11th Banff Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, Banff, Canada, 1998, Dept. Computer Science, University of Calgary, CA <http://kmi.open.ac.uk/~john/banff98-paper/domingue.html>Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dublin Core: Metadata Element Set (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Embley, D.W., Campbell, D.M., Smith, R.D. and Liddle, S.W. Ontology-Based Extraction and Structuring of Information from Data-Rich Unstructured Documents. In Proc. CIKM–98: Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Bethesda, MD, USA, 1998, ACM Press: New York, pp. 52–59Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fensel, D., Decker, S., Erdmann, M. and Studer, R. Ontobroker: The Very High Idea. In Proc. FLAIRS-98: 11th Annual Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium, Florida, 1998Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gruber, T.R. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5,2, 1993, pp. 199–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gruber, T.R. Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43,5/6, 1995, pp. 907–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grudin, J. Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers. Communications of the ACM, 37,1, 1994, pp. 92–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Halasz, F.G. Reflections on Notecards: Seven Issues for the Next Generation of Hypermedia Systems. Communications of the ACM, 31, 1988, pp. 836–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Halasz, F.G. and Schwartz, M. The Dexter Hypertext Reference Model. Communications of the ACM, 37,2, 1994, pp. 30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Heflin, J., Hendler, J. and Luke, S. Reading Between the Lines: Using SHOE to Discover Implicit Knowledge from the Web. In AAAI-98 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Information Integration, Stanford, CA <http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/plus/SHOE/shoeaaai98.ps>
  24. 24.
    IMS The Instructional Management System (IMS) Project. 1994 <http://www.imsproject.org>
  25. 25.
    JIME: Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Knowledge Media Institute, Open University <http://www-jime.open.ac.uk>
  26. 26.
    Lee, J. SIBYL: A Qualitative Decision Management System. In Artificial intelligence at MIT: Expanding Frontiers, Winston, P. and Shellard, S., (Ed.), MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1990, pp. 105–133Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    LoC USMARC Format for Bibliographic Data, Including Guidelines for Content Designation. Network Development and MARC Standards Office, Library of Congress, Cataloging Distribution Service, Washington DC, 1994Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Marshall, C.C. and Rogers, R.A. Two Years before the Mist: Experiences with Aquanet. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Hypertext, 1992, pp. 53–62Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marshall, C.C. and Shipman, F.M. Spatial Hypertext: Designing for Change. Communications of the ACM, 38,8, 1995, pp. 88–97 <http://irss.njit.edu:5080/cgibin/bin/option.csh?mar-ship/marshall.html>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Motta, E. An Overview of the OCML Modelling Language. In Proceedings KEML’98: 8th Workshop on Knowledge Engineering Methods & Languages, Karlsruhe, Germany, Jan. 21–22, 1998, 1998Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Motta, E., Buckingham Shum, S. and Domingue, J. Case Studies in Ontology-Driven Document Enrichment. In Proc. KAW’99: 12th Banff Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, Banff, Canada, 1999, Dept. Computer Science, University of Calgary, CA <http://sern.ucalgary.ca/KSI/KAW/KAW99/papers/Motta1/motta.pdf>Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Newell, A. The Knowledge Level. Artificial Intelligence, 18,1, 1982, pp. 87–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Riva, A. and Ramoni, M. LispWeb: a Specialized HTTP Server for Distributed AI Applications. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems (Proc. WWW96 Conference), 28, 7–11, 1996, pp. 953–961 <http://kmi.open.ac.uk/~marco/papers/www96/www96.html>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schuler, W. and Smith, J. Author–s Argumentation Assistant (AAA): A Hypertext-Based Authoring Tool for Argumentative Texts. In Proc. ECHT’90: European Conference on Hypertext: Argumentation, Design & Knowledge Acquisition, Cambridge, 1990, Cambridge University Press, pp. 137–151Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Selvin, A. Supporting Collaborative Analysis and Design with Hypertext Functionality. Journal of Digital Information, 1,4, 1999 <http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v01/i04/Selvin/>
  36. 36.
    Shipman, F.M. and Marshall, C.C. Formality Considered Harmful: Experiences, Emerging Themes, and Directions on the Use of Formal Representations in Interactive Systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, in press, 1999Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shipman, F.M. and McCall, R. Supporting Knowledge-Base Evolution with Incremental Formalization. In Proc. ACM CHI–94: Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, Mass., 1994, ACM Press: New York, pp. 285–291Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Smolensky, P., Fox, B., King, R. and Lewis, C. Computer-Aided Reasoned Discourse Or, How to Argue with a Computer. In Cognitive Science and its Application to Human-Computer Interaction, Guindon, R., (Ed.), Ablex: Norwood, New Jersey, 1988, pp. 109–162Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sumner, T. and Buckingham Shum, S. From Documents to Discourse: Shifting Conceptions of Scholarly Publishing. In Proc. CHI 98: Human Factors in Computing Systems, Los Angeles, CA, 1998, ACM Press: NY, pp. 95–102 <http://d3e.open.ac.uk/general/d3echi98/>Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Toulmin, S. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1958Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Trigg, R. and Weiser, M. TEXTNET: A Network-Based Approach to Text Handling. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 4,1, 1983Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    W3C Resource Description Framework (RDF). World Wide Web Consortium, 1997 <http://www.w3.org/Metadata/RDF/Overview.html>
  43. 43.
    Weinstein, P. Ontology-Based Metadata. In Proceedings of the Third ACM Digital Library Conference, Pittsburgh, PA (June), 1998Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Weinstein, P. and Alloway, G. Seed Ontologies: Growing Digital Libraries as Distributed, Intelligent Systems. In Proceedings of the Second ACM Digital Library Conference, Philadelphia, PA, USA (July), 1997, ACM PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Buckingham Shum
    • 1
  • Enrico Motta
    • 1
  • John Domingue
    • 1
  1. 1.Knowledge Media InstituteThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations