Stochastic Theory and Control pp 353-368 | Cite as
Optimal Strategies for Ergodic Control Problems Arising from Portfolio Optimization
Abstract
We consider constructing optimal strategies for risk-sensitive portfolio optimization problems on an infinite time horizon for general factor models, where the mean returns and the volatilities of individual securities or asset categories are explicitly affected by economic factors. The factors are assumed to be general diffusion processes. In studying the ergodic type Bellman equations of the risk-sensitive portfolio optimization problems we introduce some auxiliary classical stochastic control problems with the same Bellman equations as the original ones. We show that the optimal diffusion processes of the problem are ergodic and that under some condition related to integrability by the invariant measures of the diffusion processes we can construct optimal strategies for the original problems by using the solution of the Bellman equations.
Keywords
Time Horizon Optimal Strategy Invariant Measure Portfolio Optimization Investment StrategyPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Bhattacharya, R. N. (1978) Criteria for recurrence and existence of invariant measures for multidimensional diffusions, The Annals of Probability 6, 541–553MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bensoussan, A. (1992) Stochastic Control of Partially Observable Systems, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
- 3.Bensoussan, A., Frehse, J., and Nagai, H. (1998) Some Results on Risk-sensitive with full observation, Appl. Math. and its Optimization 37, 1–41.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 4.Bielecki, T. R. and Pliska, S. R. (1999) Risk-Sensitive Dynamic Asset Management. Appl. Math. Optim. 39, 337–360.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 5.Bielecki, T. R. and Pliska, S. R. (2001) Risk-Sensitive Intertemporal CAPM, With Application to Fixed Income Management, preprint.Google Scholar
- 6.El Karoui, N. and Quenez, M.-C. (1995) Dynamic Programming pricing of contingent claims in an incomplete market, SIAM J. Cont. Optim. 33, 29–66.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 7.Fleming, W. H. and McEneaney, W. M. (1995) Risk-sensitive control on an infinite horizon, SIAM J. Control and Optimization 33, 1881–1915.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 8.Fleming, W. H. and Sheu, S. J. (1999) Optimal Long Term Growth Rate of Expected Utility of Wealth, Ann. Appl. Prob. 9, 871–903.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 9.Fleming, W. H. and Sheu, S. J. (2000) Risk-sensitive control and an optimal investment model, Mathematical Finance 10, 197–213.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 10.Fleming, W. H. and Sheu, S. J. (2001) Risk-sensitive control and an optimal investment model (II), preprint.Google Scholar
- 11.Has’minskii R. Z. (1980) Stochastic stability of differential equations, Sijthoff and Noordhoff, Alphen aan den Rijin.Google Scholar
- 12.Kaise, H. and Nagai, H. (1998) Bellman-Isaacs equations of ergodic type related to risk-sensitive control and their singular limits, Asymptotic Analysis 16, 347–362.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 13.Kaise, H. and Nagai, H. (1999) Ergodic type Bellman equations of risk-sensitive control with large parameters and their singular limits, Asymptotic Analysis 20, 279–299.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kuroda, K. and Nagai, H. (2001) Ergodic type Bellman equation of risksensitive control and potfolio optimization on infinite time horizon, A volume in honor of A. Benosussan, Eds. J. L. Menaldi et al., IOS Press, 530–538.Google Scholar
- 15.Kuroda, K. and Nagai, H. (2000) Risk-sensitive portfolio optimization on infinite time horizon, Preprint.Google Scholar
- 16.Nagai, H. (1996) Bellman equations of risk-sensitive control, SIAM J. Control and Optimization 34, 74–101.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 17.Nagai, H. and Peng, S. (2001) Risk-sensitive dynamic portfolio optimization with partial information on infinite time horizon, Annals of Appl. Prob., to appear.Google Scholar
- 18.Wonham, W. M. (1968) On a Matrix Riccati Equation of Stochastic Control, SIAM J. Control Optim. 6, 681–697.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar