Advertisement

Getting to Know Me: Helping Learners Understand Their Own Learning Needs through Metacognitive Scaffolding

  • Rosemary Luckin
  • Louise Hammerton
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2363)

Abstract

Software scaffolding has been successfully employed within educational technology to help bridge the recognition-production gap between what learners want to achieve and what they are able to effect themselves without assistance. Such work has however concentrated on scaffolding the learner at the domain level with less attention to the potential for providing explicit support at the Metacognitive level. Evidence from previous work has shown that less able and less knowledgeable learners are especially ineffective at selecting appropriately challenging tasks and seeking appropriate qualities and quantities of support and guidance [1, 2]. But how can we make learners more effective at reflecting on their own needs, at seeking appropriate challenges and appropriate support? We have used a participatory design approach to assist young learners in the design process so that they can, in turn, assist us as we develop Metacognitive scaffolding strategies. These strategies have been implemented in Ecolab II. Early results are encouraging and suggest that low ability children can too be scaffolded to greater success.

Keywords

Metacognition Software Scaffolding Vygotsky Learner modelling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Luckin, R. and B. du Boulay, Ecolab: the Development and Evaluation of a Vygotskian Design Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 1999. 10(2): p. 198–220.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wood, H.A. and D. Wood, Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Computers and Education, 1999. 33(2-3): p. 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vygotsky, L.S., Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. 1978, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vygotsky, L.S., Thought and Language. 1986, Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wood, D.J., J.S. Bruner, and G. Ross, The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1976. 17(2): p. 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Soloway, E., et al., Learning theory in practice: Case studies of learner-centred design, in CHI 96 Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common Ground, M.J. Tauber, Editor. 1996, ACM press: Vancouver. p. 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wood, D., et al., EXPLAIN: Experiments in planning and instruction. Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour Quarterly Newsletter, 1992. 81: p. 13–16.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosson, M.B. and J.M. Carroll, Scaffolded examples for learning object-oriented design. Communications of the ACM, 1996. 39(4): p. 46–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bliss, J., Askew, M. & Macrae, S., Effective teaching and learning: scaffolding revisited. Oxford Review of Education, 1996. 22(1): p. 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jackson, S.L., J. Krajcik, and E. Soloway, The Design of Guided Learner-Adaptable Scaffolding in Interactive Learning Environments. CHI 98 Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1998: p. 187–194.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luckin, R.,’ ECOLAB’: Explorations in the Zone of Proximal Development. 1998, School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wood, D.J., Wood, H. A. & Middleton, D. J., An experimental evaluation of four face-to-face teaching strategies. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 1978. 1: p. 131–147.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldstein, P., The genetic graph: a representation for the evolution of procedural knowledge, in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, D. Sleeman and J.S. Brown, Editors. 1982, Academic Press: New York.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Flavell, J.H., Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 1979. 34: p. 906–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown, A.L., Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms., in Metacognition, motivation, and understanding, F. E. Weinert and R.H. Kluwe, Editors. 1987, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.: Hillsdale, New Jersey:. p. 65–116.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dahlback, N., A. Jonasson, and L. Ahrenberg, Wizard of Oz studies: Why and How? Knowledge Based Systems, 1993. 6: p. 258–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luckin, R. and L. Hammerton. „OK, I’ll have someone help me for a changeTalking to children about task difficulty and help seeking to inform software scaffolding design. in International Conference on Communication, Problem-solving and Learning. 2001. University of Strathclyde, Scotland.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hammerton, L. and R. Luckin, You be the Computer and I’ll be the Learner: Using the ‘Wizard of Oz’ Technique to Involve Children in the Software Design Process, in Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: AIED in the Wired and Wireless Future., J. Moore, W.L. Johnson, and C.L. Redfield, Editors. 2001, IOS Press: Amsterdam. p. 551–553.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hammerton, L. and R. Luckin, How to help? Investigating children’s opinions on help: To inform the design of Metacognitive Software Scaffolding, in AIED2001 Workshop Proceedings: Help provision and help seeking in Interactive Learning Environments., R. Luckin, Editor. 2001, St Mary’s University: San Antonio. p. 22–33.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luckin, R., Knowledge construction in the zone of collaboration: scaffolding the learner to productive interactivity, in International Conference of the Learning Sciences, A. Bruckman, et al., Editors. 1998, AACE: Atlanta, Georgia. p. 188–194.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosemary Luckin
    • 1
  • Louise Hammerton
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Centred TechnologySchool of Cognitive & Computing Sciences University of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations