An Intelligent Teaching Assistant System for Logic

  • Leanna Lesta
  • Kalina Yacef
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2363)

Abstract

This paper presents the Logic-ITA, an Intelligent Teaching Assistant system for the teaching/learning of propositional logic. Intelligent Teaching Assistant Systems are dedicated both to learners and teachers. The system embeds three tools: the Logic Tutor, the LT-Configurator and the LT-Analyser. The Logic Tutor is an intelligent tutoring system destined to the students. The other two tools are dedicated to the teacher. The LT-Configurator manages teaching configuration settings and material. The LT-Analyser is for monitoring the class’ progress and collect data.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abraham, D., Crawford, L., Lesta, L., Merceron, A., Yacef, K. (2001). The Logic Tutor: A multimedia presentation, Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, October 2001 issue (http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2001/2/03/index.asp).
  2. 2.
    Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R. & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), pp 167–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brusilovsky, P., Schwarz, E., and Weber, G. (1996). ELM-ART: An intelligent tutoring system on World Wide Web. In C. Frasson, G. Gauthier, & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS-96 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1086), Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 261–269.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Croy, M.J. (1989) CAI and Empirical Explorations of Deductive Proof Construction. In The Computers and Philosophy Newsletter, Vol 4, 111–127.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kay, J. (2000). Invited keynote: Stereotypes, student models and scrutability. In Gauthier, G, Frasson, C & VanLehn, K (Eds): 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 19–30.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kay, J. (2001). Learner control. International Journal on User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11(1/2):111–127, Kluwer Academic Publishers.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kobsa, A. (2001). Tailoring Privacy to Users’ Needs (Invited Keynote). In M. Bauer, P. J. Gmytrasiewicz and J. Vassileva, eds.: User Modeling 2001: 8th International Conference. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 303–313.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mark, M.A. & Greer, J.E. (1995). The VCR tutor: Effective Instruction for device operation. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 209–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scheines, R. & Sieg W. (1994). Computer Environments for Proof Construction. Interactive Learning Environments, 4(2), 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wiggins, G & Trewin, S. (2000). A System for Concerned Teaching of Musical Aural Skills. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Gauthier, G., Frasson, C & VanLehn, K (Eds), pp 494–503.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yacef, K (2002). Intelligent Teaching Assistant Systems. University of Sydney Technical Report 533.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leanna Lesta
    • 1
  • Kalina Yacef
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information TechnologiesUniversity of SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations