GARP — The Evolution of a Software Acquisition Process Model

  • Thomas Gantner
  • Tobias Häberlein
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2349)

Abstract

At DaimlerChrysler, the greatest part of the business and automotive software is provided by suppliers, often developed in complex software acquisition projects. Therefore, the development of a mature software acquisition process is essential for business success. One task of the DaimlerChrysler software process research department is the evaluation, customisation, and implementation of methods and techniques for software acquisition. This paper gives an overview of software acquisition process activities that were performed at this department. We developed a comprehensive lifecycle oriented model of a software acquisition reference process. The sub-steps of this process model are further explained by best practices. Furthermore, we describe how we used this acquisition process reference model for improving software acquisition activities at DaimlerChrysler.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    European Cooperation for Space Standardization (ECSS): Space Engineering, Software, ESA Publications Division ESTEC, P.O. Box 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Federal Aviation Administration: Integrated Capability Maturity Model. http://www.faa.gov/aio/icmm/FAA.htm
  3. 3.
    Getto, G.: Evaluation von Prozessen und Methoden für Softwarebeschaffung und Management von Auftragnehmern, In Proceedings of the 4th Kongress Software Qualitätsmanagement ”Made in Germany” (SQM1999), 1999Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Getto, G., Gantner T.: Software Acquisition Processes at DaimlerChrysler AG: Research Activities for Improvement, In Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Process Improvement (SPI99), 1999Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Getto, G., Gantner, T., Vullinghs, T.: Software Acquisition: Experiences with Models and Methods. In EuroSPI, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nigel Gilbert and Klaus G. Troitzsch. Simulation for the social scientist. Open University Press-Buckingham-Philadelphia, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    IEEE Standards Association. IEEE 1062: IEEE Recommended Practice for Software Acquisition, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ISPL: Information Service Procurement Library. Managing Acquisition Processes, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ludewig, J.; Deininger, M.: Teaching software project management by simulation: The SESAM project. In Irish Quality Association (ed.), 5th European Conference on Software Quality, pages 417–426, Dublin, 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The Opengroup: Beyond the Contract: An Analysis of the business impact of IT procurement best practices, ISBN 1-85912-281-7. 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pidd, M. Computer Simulation in Management Science, Wiley, Chichester, 1984.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    The Procurement Forum, Rond Point Schuman 6, B1040 Brussels, Belgium, http://www.procurementforum.org
  13. 13.
    PULSE: A Methodology for Assessment and Benchmarking of Procurement Processes. http://www.ispo.cec.be/sprites2/fi-pulse.htm
  14. 14.
    Esa Rosendahl, Ton Vullinghs: Performing Initial Risk Assessment in Software Acquisition Projects, to be published at the 7th European Conference on Software Quality, Helsinki, 2002.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Schreiber. Beschaffung von Informatikmitteln. Pflichtenheft, Evaluation, Entscheidung. Paul Haupt Verlag, 2000.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Software Engineering Institute. Software Acquisition Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.02, CMU/SEI-99-tr002, Jack Cooper and Metthew Fisher and S. Wayne Sherer editors, 2001.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Software Program Managers Network. Program Managers Guide to Software Acquisition. http://www.spmn.com/pdf_download.html

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Gantner
    • 1
  • Tobias Häberlein
    • 2
  1. 1.DaimlerChryslerResearch and TechnologyUlm
  2. 2.Faculty of Computer Science, Department of Software MethodologyUniversity of UlmGermany

Personalised recommendations