Towards Open Adaptive Hypermedia

  • Christopher Bailey
  • Wendy Hall
  • David E. Millard
  • Mark J. Weal
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2347)


Research at the University of Southampton has extended generalised Open Hypermedia (OH) models to include concepts of context and behaviour, both traditionally very important to the Adaptive Hypermedia (AH) domain. In this paper we re-evaluate Brusilovsky’s pragmatic taxonomy of AH techniques from a structural perspective. A variety of OH structures are discussed that can be used to implement the techniques found in the taxonomy. By identifying common structures we gain a new perspective on the relationship between different AH techniques.


Open Hypermedia Adaptive Techniques Hypermedia Structure FOHM taxonomy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anderson, K.M., Taylor, R.N. and Whitehead, E.J. (1994). “Chimera: Hypertext for Heterogeneous Software Environments”. In ECHT’ 94. Proceedings of the ACM European conference on Hypermedia technology, Sept. 18–23, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, pp 94–197, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bailey C., El-Beltagy, S.R. and Hall, W. (2001). “Link Augmentation: A Context-Based Approach to Support Adaptive Hypermedia”. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia, August 14–18, Århus, Denmark, LNCS 2266, pp. 239–251.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brusilovsky, P. (1996). “Methods and Techniques of Adaptive Hypermedia”. Journal of User Modelling and User-Adaptive Interaction 6, n 2–3, pp 87–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brusilovsky, P. (2001). “Adaptive hypermedia”. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, Ten Year Anniversary Issue 11 (Alfred Kobsa, ed.), pp 87–110.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brusilovsky, P., Eklund, J. and Schwarz, E. (1998). “Web-based education for all: A tool for developing adaptive courseware”. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems. Proceedings of 7th International World Wide Web Conference, April 14–18, 30(1-7), pp 291–300, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, L. and Sycara, K. (1998). “WebMate: Personal Agent for Browsing and Searching”. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents, St. Paul, MN, May. ACM Press, New York, NY. pp. 132–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis, H.C., Rizk A. and Lewis A.J. (1996). “OHP: A Draft Proposal for a Standard Open Hypermedia Protocol”. In Uffe Kock Wiil and Serge Demeyer, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Open Hypermedia Systems, ACM Hypertext’ 96, Washington, D.C., March 16–20, 1996.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Bra, P. and Calvi, L. (1998). “AHA! An open Adaptive Hypermedia Architecture”. The New Review of Hypertext and Multimedia 4, 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Espinoza, F. and Höök, K. (1997). “A WWW Interface to an Adaptive Hypermedia System”. Presented at PAAM”96, London, UK, April 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fountain, A.M., Hall, W., Heath, I. and Davis, H.C. (1990). “MICROCOSM: An Open Model for Hypermedia With Dynamic Linking”. In A. Rizk, N. Streitz, and J. Andre, editors, Hypertext: Concepts, Systems and Applications (Proceedings of ECHT’90), pp 298–311. Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grønæk, K. and Trigg, R.H. (1994). “Design issues for a Dexter-based hypermedia system”. Communications of the ACM, 37(3) pp 40–49, Feb. 1994.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hall, W., Davis, H., Hutchings, G. (1996). “Rethinking Hypermedia: The Microcosm Approach” Electronic Publishing Series, No 4. Kluwer Academic Pub; ISBN: 0792396790.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hothi, J. & Hall, W. (1998). “An Evaluation of Adapted Hypermedia Techniques using Static User Modelling”. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia, Pittsburgh, USA, June 20–24, pp 45–50, 1998.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lieberman, H. (1995). “Letizia: An Agent That Assists Web Browsing”. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, August 1995.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maglio, P.P. and Farrell, S. (2000). “LiveInfo: Adapting web experience by customization and annotation”. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems. AH2000, Trento, Italy, August 2000.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Michaelides, D.T., Millard, D.E., Weal, M.J. and De Roure, D., C. (2001). “Auld Leaky: A Contextual Open Hypermedia Link Server”. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Open Hypermedia Systems, ACM Hypertext 2001 Conference. Aarhus, Denmark 2001.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Millard, D.E., Moreau, L, Davis, H.C. and Reich, S. (2000). “FOHM: A Fundamental Open Hypertext Model for Investigating Interoperability Between Hypertext Domains”. In Proceedings of the’ 00 ACM Conference on Hypertext, May 30-June 3, San Antonio, TX, pp 93–102, 2000.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perkowitz, M. and Etzioni, O. (1999). “Towards adaptive web sites: Conceptual cluster mining”. In Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1999.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stern, M.K. & Woolf, B.P. (1998). “Curriculum Sequencing in a Web-Based Tutor”. In the Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Bailey
    • 1
  • Wendy Hall
    • 1
  • David E. Millard
    • 1
  • Mark J. Weal
    • 1
  1. 1.IAM Group ECSUniversity of SouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations