On Adaptability of Web Sites for Visually Handicapped People

  • Mercedes Macías
  • Julia González
  • Fernando Sánchez
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2347)


Currently, the great majority of content published on the Internet is inaccessible to visually impaired users. Although designers have guidelines that guarantee the accessibility of pages constructed as well as software tools to facilitate this task, it is necessary to consider the user’s perspective too, allowing him/her to participate in the restructuring or presentation process of contents. There are few software tools which are able to do this. In this paper we present KAI (Accessibility Kit for the Internet) that considers both the user and the designer. It classifies the different components of a published Web page and presents them to the user according to his/her needs. KAI is based on a new language, BML (Blind Markup Language) that helps authors to develop better structured pages. It provides two levels of independence: original Web code and user browser or navigation platform. KAI includes a mixed audio/touch browser (WebTouch) that enables selective reading of contents. The proposed accessibility kit uses several accessibility metrics to ensure that those pages transformed by KAI are more accessible than the original ones. In this paper we give an overview of the overall system.


Authoring Tool Screen Reader Accessibility Guideline Impaired User Alternative Text 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G. and Jacobs, I: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0., W3C Recommendation,, 5/5/1999.
  2. 2.
    Treviranus, J., McCathieNevile, C., Jacobs, I., Richards, J.: Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0., W3C Recommendation,, 3/2/2000.
  3. 3.
    Jacobs, I., Gunderson, J., Hansen, E.: User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0., W3C Working Draft,, 22/6/2001.
  4. 4.
    Web Accessibility Initiative. Evaluation, Repair, and Transformation Tools for Web Content Accessibility. W3C.
  5. 5.
    CAST, Welcome to Bobby 3.2., CAST,
  6. 6.
    Raggett, D.: Clean up your Web pages with HTML TIDY, W3C,, 4/8/2000.
  7. 7.
    Muffin, World Wide Web Filtering System 0.9.,
  8. 8.
    Vorburger, M.: ALTifier Web Accessibility Enhancement Tool,, 1998-1999.
  9. 9.
    Gunderson, J.: Web Accessible., 1999-00.
  10. 10.
    Cascado et al: Web adaptor for the visually handicapped, Grupo de robótica y Tecnología de computadores aplicado a la Rehabilitación. Facultad de Informática. Universidad de Sevilla. Proceedings of Iberdiscap2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO/IEC 9126-1: 2001 (E), International Standard Software Engineering-Product Quality-Part 1: Quality model.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olsina, L.: Web Engineering: A Quantitative Methodology for Quality Evaluation and Comparison of Web Applications, Doctoral Thesis (in Spanish), Ciencias Exactas School, UNLP, La Plata, Argentina. 2000, April.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Olsina L., Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J., Lafuente G., Pastor, O.: Toward Automated Web Metrics. Proceedings of WQS2001, Anais do VIII Workshop de Qualidade de Software, October, RJ, BR, pp. 74–86.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Logitech, IFeel Mouseman,
  15. 15.
    IBM, IBM Home Page Reader.
  16. 16.
    Henter Joyce, Jaws for Windows,

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mercedes Macías
    • 1
  • Julia González
    • 1
  • Fernando Sánchez
    • 1
  1. 1.Escuela PolitécnicaUniversidad de ExtremaduraCáceresSpain

Personalised recommendations