ISHPC 2002: High Performance Computing pp 146-159 | Cite as
High Performance and Energy Efficient Serial Prefetch Architecture
Abstract
Energy efficient architecture research has flourished recently, in an attempt to address packaging and cooling concerns of current microprocessor designs, as well as battery life for mobile computers. Moreover, architects have become increasingly concerned with the complexity of their designs in the face of scalability, verification, and manufacturing concerns.
In this paper, we propose and evaluate a high performance, energy and complexity efficient front-end prefetch architecture. This design, called Serial Prefetching, combines a high fetch bandwidth branch prediction and efficient instruction prefetching architecture with a low-energy instruction cache. Serial Prefetching explores the benefit of decoupling the tag component of the cache from the data component. Cache blocks are first verified by the tag component of the cache, and then the accesses are put into a queue to be consumed by the data component of the instruction cache. Energy is saved by only accessing the correct way of the data component specified by the tag lookup in a previous cycle. The tag component does not stall on a I-cache miss, only the data component. The accesses that miss in the tag component are speculatively brought in from lower levels of the memory hierarchy. This in effect performs a prefetch, while the access migrates through the queue to be consumed by the data component.
Keywords
Memory Hierarchy Data Component Cache Replacement Instruction Cache Cache BlockPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.V. Agarwal, M. Hrishikesh, S. Keckler, and D. Burger. Clock rate versus ipc: The end of the road for conventional microarchitectures. In 27th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, 2000.Google Scholar
- 2.D. Brooks, V. Tiwari, and M. Martonosi. Wattch: A framework for architectural-level power analysis and optimizations. In 27th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, 2000.Google Scholar
- 3.D. C. Burger and T. M. Austin. The simplescalar tool set, version 2.0. Technical Report CS-TR-97-1342, University of Wisconsin, Madison, June 1997.Google Scholar
- 4.G. Chrysos and J. Emer. Memory dependence prediction using store sets. In 25th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, June 1998.Google Scholar
- 5.J. Montanaro et al. A 160 mhz 32b 0.5w cmos risc microprocessor. In Digital Technical Journal, August 1997.Google Scholar
- 6.L. Gwennap. Power issues may limit future cpus. Microprocessor Report, August 1996.Google Scholar
- 7.H. Igehy, M. Eldridge, and K. Proudfoot. Prefetching in a texture cache architecture. In Proceedings of the 1998 Eurographics/SIGGRAPH Workshop on Graphics Hardware, 1999.Google Scholar
- 8.R. Kessler. The alpha 21264 microprocessor. In IEEE Micro, April 1999.Google Scholar
- 9.J. McCormack, R. McNamara, C. Gianos, L. Seiler, N. Jouppi, and K. Correll. Neon: a single-chip 3d workstation graphics accelerator. In Proceedings of the 1998 EUROGRAPHICS/SIGGRAPH workshop on Graphics Hardware, 1999.Google Scholar
- 10.S. McFarling. Combining branch predictors. Technical Report TN-36, Digital Equipment Corporation, Western Research Lab, June 1993.Google Scholar
- 11.J. Rabaey. Digital Integrated Circuits. Prentice Hall Electronics and VLSI Series., 1996.Google Scholar
- 12.G. Reinman, T. Austin, and B. Calder. A scalable front-end architecture for fast instruction delivery. In 26th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, May 1999.Google Scholar
- 13.G. Reinman, B. Calder, and T. Austin. Fetch directed instruction prefetching. In 32st International Symposium on Microarchitecture, November 1999.Google Scholar
- 14.G. Reinman, B. Calder, and T. Austin. Optimizations enabled by a decoupled front-end architecture. In IEEE Transactions on Computers, April 2001.Google Scholar
- 15.G. Reinman and N. Jouppi. Cacti version 2.0. http://www.research.digital.com/wrl/people/jouppi/CACTI.html, June 1999.
- 16.T. Sherwood, E. Perelman, and B. Calder. Basic block distribution analysis to find periodic behavior and simulation points in applications. In International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques, September 2001.Google Scholar
- 17.B. Solomon, A. Mendelson, D. Orenstien, Y. Almog, and R. Ronen. Micro-operation cache: A power aware frontend for variable instruction length isa. In International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, 2001.Google Scholar