Advertisement

A Model-Based, Open Architecture for Mobile, Spatially Aware Applications

  • Daniela Nicklas
  • Matthias Großmann
  • Thomas Schwarz
  • Steffen Volz
  • Bernhard Mitschang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2121)

Abstract

With the emerging availability of small and portable devices that are able to determine their position and to communicate wirelessly, mobile and spatially aware applications become feasible. These applications rely on information that is bound to locations. In this paper we present neXus, a platform for such applications, which is open for both new applications and new information providers, similar to the World Wide Web. Distributed servers provide location-based information, which is federated to an integrated view for the applications. To achieve this goal, we present the concept of the Augmented World Model, which is a common data model for location-based information. We give an example to show how applications can use this platform.

Keywords

Spatial Model Virtual Object Mobile Object Open Architecture Real World Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anders,-H., Sester, M.: Methods of Data Base Interpretation-Applied to Model Generalization from Large to Medium Scale. In: Förstner, W., Plumer, L. (eds.) SMATI’97: Semantic Modelling for the Acquisition of Topographic Information from Images and Maps. Birkenhäuser (1997) 89–103.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Busse, R.-D. Kutsche, U. Leser, H. Weber: Federated Information Systems: Concepts, Terminology and Architectures, Forschungberichte des Fachbereichs Informatik, Bericht Nr. 99-9, Technische Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Batini, M. Lenzerini, S.B. Navathe: A Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Database Schema Integration, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 323–364, Dec. 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Donald D. Chamberlin, Jonathan Robie, Daniela Florescu: Quilt: An XML Query Language for Heterogeneous Data Sources. WebDB (Informal Proceedings), pp. 53–62 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Chawathe, H. Garcia-Molina, J. Hammer, K. Ireland, Y. Papakonstantinou, J.D. Ullman, J. Widom: The TSIMMIS Project: Integration of Heterogeneous Information Sources, 16th Meeting of the Information Processing Society of Japan, pp. 7–18, Tokyo, Japan, 1994Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Garcia-Molina, Y. Papakonstantinou, D. Quass, A. Rajaraman, Y. Sagiv, J.D. Ullman, V. Vassalos, J. Widom: The TSIMMIS Approach to Mediation: Data Models and Languages, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 117–132, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Hohl, U. Kubach, A. Leonhardi, K. Rothermel, M. Schwehm: Next Century Challenges: Nexus-An Open Global Infrastructure for Spatial-Aware Applications, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom’99), Seattle, Washington, USA, August 15–20, 1999, T. Imielinski, M. Steenstrup, (Eds.), ACM Press, 1999, pp. 249–255.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laurini, R.: Spatial Multi-database Topological Continuity and Indexing: a Step towards Seamless GIS Data Interoperability. Int. J. Geographical Information Science, Vol. 12, No. 4(1998)373–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leonhardi, A.; Kubach, U.: An Architecture for a Distributed Universal Location Service. Proceedings of the European Wireless’ 99 Conference, Munich, Germany, pp. 351–355, ITG Fachbericht, VDE Verlag, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Long, R. Kooper, G.D. Abowd, C.G. Atkeson: Rapid Prototyping of Mobile Context-aware Applications: The Cyberguide Case Study, Proceedings of the Second Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom’96), pp. 97–107, Rye, New York, USA, 1996, ACM PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Leonhardi, U. Kubach, K. Rothermel, A. Fritz: Virtual Information Towers-A Metaphor for Intuitive, Location-Aware Information Access in a Mobile Environment, Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC’99), San Fransisco, CA, USA, IEEE Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L.V.S. Lakshmanan, F. Sadri, I.N. Subramanian: On the Logical Foundation of Schema Integration and Evolution in Heterogeneous Database Systems, 2nd. Int. Conf. on Deductive and Object-Oriented Databases, Phoenix, Arizona, Springer Heidelberg, Berlin, New York, pp. 81–100, 1993Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Malaka, A. Zipf (2000). Deep Map-Challenging IT Research in the Framework of a Tourist Information System, in D. R. Fesenmaier, S. Klein, D. Buhalis (eds), Information and communication technologies in tourism 2000, pp. 15–27, Springer-Verlag, Wien, New York.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mackaness, W., Weibel, R., Buttenfield, B. Report of the 1997 ICA Workshop on Map Generalization. Technical report, 19th until 21st of June 1997. http://www.geo.unizh.ch/ICA/. Gävle Sweden (1997).
  15. 15.
    W. Möhlenbrink: Traffic Guidance and Information Systems-New Technologiesfor the Geoinformation Market. Symposium on Geodesy for Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, Eisenstadt bei Wien, 1998.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Open GIS Consortium: Inc. Open GIS Consortium. http://www.opengis.org (2001).
  17. 17.
    Open GIS Consortium: Geography Markup Language (GML) vl.O. Recommendation paper, OGC Document Number: 00-029, Date: 12-May-2000. Avaible at http://www.opengis.org (2000)
  18. 18.
    Y. Papakonstantinou, S. Abiteboul, H. Garcia-Molina: Object Fusion in Mediator Systems, T.M. Vijayaraman, A.P. Buchmann, C. Mohan, N.L. Sarda (eds.): 22nd Conf. on Very Large Databases, VLDB, Mumbai (Bombay), India, 1996Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sester, M., Anders, K.-H., Walter, V.: Linking Objects of Different Spatial Data Sets by Integration and Aggregation. GeoInformatica(4) (1998) 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A.P. Sheth, J.A. Larson: Federated Database Systems for Managing Distributed, Heterogeneous, and Autonomous Databases, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 183–236, Sep. 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spohrer, J. (1999b, June 16). WorldBoard; tWhat Comes After the WWW?, Learning Communities Group, ATG, (c)Apple Computer, Inc. Available: http://worldboard.org/pub/spohrer/wbconcept/default.html
  22. 22.
    Walter, V, Fritsch, D.: Matching Spatial Data Sets: a Statistical Approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science(5) (1999) 445–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang, F.: Query Optimization for a Distributed Geographic Information System. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing Vol. 65, No. 12 (1999) 1427–1438.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela Nicklas
    • 1
  • Matthias Großmann
    • 1
  • Thomas Schwarz
    • 1
  • Steffen Volz
    • 2
  • Bernhard Mitschang
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Parallel and Distributed High-Performance Systems (IPVR)StuttgartGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Photogrammetry (ifp)StuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations