Advertisement

The DEDICA Project: The Solution to the Interoperability Problems between the X.509 and EDIFACT Public Key Infrastructures

  • Montse Rubia
  • Juan Carlos Cruellas
  • Manel Medina
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1740)

Abstract

This paper introduces the barriers of interoperability that exist between the X.509 and EDIFACT Public Key Infrastructures (PKI), and proposes a solution to remove them. The solution goes through the DEDICA1 (Directory based EDI Certificate Access and management) Project. The main objective of this project is to define and to provide the means to make these two infrastructures inter-operable without increasing the amount of information to be managed by them. The proposed solution is a gateway tool interconnecting both PKIs. The main goal of this gateway is to act as a TTP that “translates” certificates issued by one PKI to the other’s format, and then signs the translation to make it a new certificate. The gateway will, in fact, act as a proxy Certification Authority (CA) of the CAs of the other PKI, and will take the responsibility of the certified data authenticity, on the behalf of the original CA.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Security Joint Working Group, Proposed Draft of a MIG Handbook UN/EDIFACT Message KEYMAN, 30. June 1995.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Security Joint Working Group: Committee Draft UN/EDIFACT CD 9735-5, Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce and Transport (EDIFACT)-Application Level Syntax Rules, Part 5: Security Rules for Batch EDI (Authenticity: Integrity and Non-Repudiation of Origin, Release 1, 14. December 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    DEDICA Consortium, CEC Deliverable WP03.DST1: Technical description of X.509 and UN/EDIFACT certificates, July 1996.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    DEDICA Consortium, CEC Deliverable WP03.DST2: Naming Conversion Rules Specifications Requirements, July 1996.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DEDICA Consortium, CEC Deliverable WP03.DST3: Final Specifications of CertMap Conversion Rules, July 1996.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Network Working Group, RFC 1779: A String Representation of Distinguished Names, ISODE Consortium, 1995.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    EDIRA-Memorandum of Understanding for the Operation of EDI Registration Authorities, Final Draft. November, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Network Working Group, RFC 1959: An LDAP URL Format, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    PKIX Working Group, INTERNET-DRAFT: Internet Public Key Infrastructure, X.509 Certificate and CRL Profile, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fritz Bauspieß, Juan Carlos Cruellas, Montse Rubia, DEDICA Directory based EDI Certificate Access and Management, Digital Signature Conference, July 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Juan Carlos Cruellas, Damián Rodriguez, Montse Rubia, Manel Medina, Isabel Gallego, WP07.DST2. Final Specification of MangMap Conversion Rules, DEDICA Project, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Juan Carlos Cruellas, Damián Rodriguez, Montse Rubia, Manel Medina, Isabel Gallego, WP07.DST1. Final Specifications of MangMap, DEDICA Project, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Montse Rubia
    • 1
    • 2
  • Juan Carlos Cruellas
    • 1
  • Manel Medina
    • 1
  1. 1.Telematics Applications GroupDepartment of Computer Architecture Universitat Politècnica de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Safelayer Secure Communications S.A.Edificio World Trade Center (s4)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations