Centrality in Policy Network Drawings

Extended Abstract
  • Ulrik Brandes
  • Patrick Kenis
  • Dorothea Wagner
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1731)

Abstract

We report on first results of a cooperation aiming at the usage of graph drawing techniques to convey domain-specific information contained in policy or, more general, social networks. Policy network analysis is an approach to study policy making processes, structures and outcomes, thereby concentrating on the analysis of relations between policy actors. An important operational concept for the analysis of policy networks is centrality, i.e. the distinction of actors according to their importance in a relational structure. Matching structural with geometric centrality we incorporate the aggregated values of centrality measures into a layout model of the network.

Keywords

Centrality Measure Betweenness Centrality Closeness Centrality Informal Communication Policy Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Vladimir Batagelj and Andrej Mrvar. Pajek-Program for large network analysis. Connections, 21:47–57, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jacques Bertin. Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. University of Wisconsin Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ulrik Brandes, Patrick Kenis, Jörg Raab, Volker Schneider, and Dorothea Wagner. Explorations into the visualization of policy networks. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11(1):75–106, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ron Davidson and David Harel. Drawing graphs nicely using simulated annealing. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 15(4):301–331, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peter Eades and Nicholas C. Wormald. Edge crossings in drawings of bipartite graphs. Algorithmica, 11:379–403, 1994.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Linton C. Freeman. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1:215–239, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Noah E. Friedkin. Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. American Journal of Sociology, 96(6):1478–1504, May 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tomihisa Kamada and Satoru Kawai. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31:7–15, 1989.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patrick Kenis and Volker Schneider. Policy networks and policy analysis: Scrutinizing a new analytical toolbox. In Bernd Marin and Renate Mayntz, editors, Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations, pages 25–59. Campus Verlag, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    David Krackhardt, Jim Blythe, and Cathleen McGrath. KrackPlot 3.0: An improved network drawing program. Connections, 17(2):53–55, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cathleen McGrath, Jim Blythe, and David Krackhardt. The effect of spatial arrangement on judgments and errors in interpreting graphs. Social Networks, 19(3):223–242, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jakob L. Moreno. Who Shall Survive: Foundations of Sociometry, Group Psycho-therapy, and Sociodrama. Beacon House, 1953.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mary L. Northway. A method for depicting social relationships obtained by sociometric testing. Sociometry, 3:144–150, 1940.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marcello G. Reggiani and Franco E. Marchetti. A proposed method for representing hierarchies. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18(1):2–8, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kozo Sugiyama, Shojiro Tagawa, and Mitsuhiko Toda. Methods for visual understanding of hierarchical system structures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 11(2):109–125, February 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Edward R. Tufte. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stanley Wasserman and Katherine Faust. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrik Brandes
    • 1
  • Patrick Kenis
    • 2
  • Dorothea Wagner
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversity of KonstanzKonstanz
  2. 2.Faculty of Social and Cultural SciencesFree UniversityAmsterdam

Personalised recommendations