Light Scattering from Microstructures pp 63-78 | Cite as
Mueller Matrices
Abstract
The measurement of Mueller matrices provides a useful way of increasing the information obtainable from scattering experiments. Nevertheless, the analysis of this information is not a simple matter because of the complicated relationships between the elements of these matrices. This chapter deals with the properties of Mueller matrices and with the analysis of physical parameters measurable by polarimetric techniques. First, the case of scattering systems that do not reduce the degree of polarization of totally-polarized incident light is studied. The “pure Mueller matrices” corresponding to these kinds of system are studied and classified by means of their polar decomposition. The general structure of Mueller matrices is then studied and is applied to the “parallel decomposition”of the scattering system. A comparison of Mueller matrices with “Stokes matrices”, the Transmittance Condition, a Purity Criterion, the Degree of Purity and Polarizance parameters are also dealt with.
Keywords
Stokes Parameter Polar Decomposition Stokes Vector Serial Combination Mueller MatrixPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.H. C. van de Hulst (1957) Light scattering by small particles Ch 5, Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 2.C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman (1983) Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles, Wiley, N. Y.Google Scholar
- 3.C. Brosseau (1988) Fundamentals of polarized light. A statistical approach, Wiley, N. Y.Google Scholar
- 4.C. V. M. van der Mee (1993) /ldAn eigenvalue criterion for matrices transforming Stokes parameters,” J. Math Phys. 34, 5072–5088MATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
- 5.J. W. Hovenier (1994) “Structure of a general pure Mueller matrix,” Appl. Opt. 33, 8318–8324ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.R. Simon (1990) “Nondepolarizing systems and degree of polarization,” Opt. Commun. 77, 349–354CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 7.B. Chakraborty (1986) “Depolarizing effect of propagation of a polarized poly-chromatic beam through an optically active medium: a generalized study,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 1422–1427CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 8.E. Wolf (1959) “Coherence properties of partially polarized electromagnetic radiation,” Nuovo Cimento 13, 1165–1181MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.R. Barakat (1985) “The statistical properties of partially polarized light,” Opt. Acta 32, 295–312Google Scholar
- 10.U. Fano (1953) “A Stokes-parameter technique for the treatment of polarization in Quantum Mechanics,” Phys. Rev. 93, 121–123CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 11.R. Simon (1982) “The connection between Mueller and Jones matrices of polarization optics,” Opt.Commun. 42, 293–297CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 12.N. G. Parke III (1948) Matrix optics (Ph. D. Thesis, M.I.T.).Google Scholar
- 13.E. L. O’Neill (1963) Introduction to Statistical Optics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
- 14.P. S. Theocaris and E. E. Gdoutos (1979) Matrix theory of photoelasticity, Ch 4, Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 15.Z. Sekera (1966) “Scattering matrices and reciprocity relationships for various representations of the state of polarization,” J. Opt. Soc. Am 56, 1732–1740CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 16.C. Whitney (1971) “Pauli-algebraic operators in polarization optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 1207–1213CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 17.J. J. Gil and E. Bernabeu (1987) “Obtainment of the polarizing and retardation parameters of a non-depolarizing optical system from its Mueller matrix,” Optik 76, 67–71Google Scholar
- 18.S.Y. Lu and R. A. Chipman (1996) “Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 13, 1106–1113CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 19.J. J. Gil (1983) Determinacion de parametros de polarizacion en representacion matricial. Contribucion teorica y realizacion de un dispositivo automatico (Ph. D. Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias, Univ. Zaragoza, Spain).Google Scholar
- 20.E. S. Fry and G. W. Kattawar (1981) “Relationships between the elements of the Stokes matrix,” Appl. Opt. 20, 3428–3435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.R. M. A. Azzam and N. M. Bashara (1977) Ellipsometry and Polarized Light, Ch 1, North-Holland, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 22.C. Brosseau, C. R. Givens, and A. B. Kostinski (1993) “Generalized trace condition on the Mueller-Jones polarization matrix,” J. Opt. Soc Am. A 10, 2248–2251CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 23.K Kim, L Mandel and E. Wolf (1987) “Relationship between Jones and Mueller matrices for random media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 433–437CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 24.S. R. Cloude (1986) “Group theory and polarisation algebra,” Optik, 75, 26–36Google Scholar
- 25.L. Mandel (1963) “Intensity fluctuations of partially polarized light,” Proc. Phys. Soc. 81, 1104–1114Google Scholar
- 26.R. Barakat (1987) “Conditions for the physical realizability of polarization matrices characterizing passive systems,” J. Mod. Optics 34, 1535–1544CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 27.J. J. Gil and E. Bernabeu (1985) “A depolarization criterion in Mueller matrices,” Opt. Acta 32, 259–261Google Scholar
- 28.P. M. Arnal (1990) Modelo matricial para el estudio de fonomenos de polarizacion de la luz (Ph. D. Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias. Univ. Zaragoza, Spain)Google Scholar
- 29.J. J. Gil and E. Bernabeu (1986) “Depolarization and polarization indices of an optical system, Opt. Acta 33, 185–189Google Scholar