Mueller Matrices

  • J. J. Gil
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 534)

Abstract

The measurement of Mueller matrices provides a useful way of increasing the information obtainable from scattering experiments. Nevertheless, the analysis of this information is not a simple matter because of the complicated relationships between the elements of these matrices. This chapter deals with the properties of Mueller matrices and with the analysis of physical parameters measurable by polarimetric techniques. First, the case of scattering systems that do not reduce the degree of polarization of totally-polarized incident light is studied. The “pure Mueller matrices” corresponding to these kinds of system are studied and classified by means of their polar decomposition. The general structure of Mueller matrices is then studied and is applied to the “parallel decomposition”of the scattering system. A comparison of Mueller matrices with “Stokes matrices”, the Transmittance Condition, a Purity Criterion, the Degree of Purity and Polarizance parameters are also dealt with.

Keywords

Stokes Parameter Polar Decomposition Stokes Vector Serial Combination Mueller Matrix 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. C. van de Hulst (1957) Light scattering by small particles Ch 5, Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman (1983) Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles, Wiley, N. Y.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Brosseau (1988) Fundamentals of polarized light. A statistical approach, Wiley, N. Y.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. V. M. van der Mee (1993) /ldAn eigenvalue criterion for matrices transforming Stokes parameters,” J. Math Phys. 34, 5072–5088MATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. W. Hovenier (1994) “Structure of a general pure Mueller matrix,” Appl. Opt. 33, 8318–8324ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Simon (1990) “Nondepolarizing systems and degree of polarization,” Opt. Commun. 77, 349–354CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Chakraborty (1986) “Depolarizing effect of propagation of a polarized poly-chromatic beam through an optically active medium: a generalized study,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 1422–1427CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Wolf (1959) “Coherence properties of partially polarized electromagnetic radiation,” Nuovo Cimento 13, 1165–1181MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Barakat (1985) “The statistical properties of partially polarized light,” Opt. Acta 32, 295–312Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    U. Fano (1953) “A Stokes-parameter technique for the treatment of polarization in Quantum Mechanics,” Phys. Rev. 93, 121–123CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Simon (1982) “The connection between Mueller and Jones matrices of polarization optics,” Opt.Commun. 42, 293–297CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. G. Parke III (1948) Matrix optics (Ph. D. Thesis, M.I.T.).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. L. O’Neill (1963) Introduction to Statistical Optics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. S. Theocaris and E. E. Gdoutos (1979) Matrix theory of photoelasticity, Ch 4, Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Z. Sekera (1966) “Scattering matrices and reciprocity relationships for various representations of the state of polarization,” J. Opt. Soc. Am 56, 1732–1740CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Whitney (1971) “Pauli-algebraic operators in polarization optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 1207–1213CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. J. Gil and E. Bernabeu (1987) “Obtainment of the polarizing and retardation parameters of a non-depolarizing optical system from its Mueller matrix,” Optik 76, 67–71Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S.Y. Lu and R. A. Chipman (1996) “Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 13, 1106–1113CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. J. Gil (1983) Determinacion de parametros de polarizacion en representacion matricial. Contribucion teorica y realizacion de un dispositivo automatico (Ph. D. Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias, Univ. Zaragoza, Spain).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. S. Fry and G. W. Kattawar (1981) “Relationships between the elements of the Stokes matrix,” Appl. Opt. 20, 3428–3435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. M. A. Azzam and N. M. Bashara (1977) Ellipsometry and Polarized Light, Ch 1, North-Holland, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. Brosseau, C. R. Givens, and A. B. Kostinski (1993) “Generalized trace condition on the Mueller-Jones polarization matrix,” J. Opt. Soc Am. A 10, 2248–2251CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    K Kim, L Mandel and E. Wolf (1987) “Relationship between Jones and Mueller matrices for random media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 433–437CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. R. Cloude (1986) “Group theory and polarisation algebra,” Optik, 75, 26–36Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. Mandel (1963) “Intensity fluctuations of partially polarized light,” Proc. Phys. Soc. 81, 1104–1114Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Barakat (1987) “Conditions for the physical realizability of polarization matrices characterizing passive systems,” J. Mod. Optics 34, 1535–1544CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. J. Gil and E. Bernabeu (1985) “A depolarization criterion in Mueller matrices,” Opt. Acta 32, 259–261Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    P. M. Arnal (1990) Modelo matricial para el estudio de fonomenos de polarizacion de la luz (Ph. D. Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias. Univ. Zaragoza, Spain)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. J. Gil and E. Bernabeu (1986) “Depolarization and polarization indices of an optical system, Opt. Acta 33, 185–189Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. J. Gil
    • 1
  1. 1.I.C.E. Universidad de ZaragozaZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations