New Trends in HERA Physics 1999 pp 412-423 | Cite as
Soft and Hard Pomerons
Conference paper
First Online:
Abstract
Regge theory provides an excellent description of small-x structure-function data from Q 2 = 0 up to the highest available values. The large-Q 2data should also be described by perturbative QCD: the two descriptions must agree in the region where they overlap. However, at present there is a serious lack in our understanding of how to apply perturbative QCD at small x. The usual lowest-order or next-to-lowest order expansion is not valid, at least not until Q 2becomes much larger than is usually assumed; a resummation is necessary, but as yet we do not know how to do this resummation.
Keywords
Structure Function Branch Point Perturbative Expansion Regge Theory High Twist
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.P D B Collins, Introduction to Regge Theory, Cambridge University Press (1977)Google Scholar
- 2.A Donnachie and P V Landshoff, Nuclear Physics B244 (1984) 322ADSGoogle Scholar
- 3.A Donnachie and P V Landshoff, Physics Letters B296 (1992) 227ADSGoogle Scholar
- 4.A Donnachie and P V Landshoff, Physics Letters B437 (1998) 408ADSGoogle Scholar
- 5.E A Kuraev, L N Lipatov and V Fadin, Soviet Physics JETP 45 (1977)Google Scholar
- 6.J C Collins and P V Landshoff, Physics Letters B276 (1992) 196; M F McDermott, J R Forshaw and G G Ross, Physics Letters B349 (1995) 189ADSGoogle Scholar
- 7.V S Fadin and L N Lipatov, Physics Letters B429 (1998) 127; G Camici and M Ciafaloni, Physics Letters B430 (1998) 349ADSGoogle Scholar
- 8.R K Ellis, W J Stirling and B R Webber, QCD and Collider Physics Cambridge University Press (1996)Google Scholar
- 9.J R Cudell, A Donnachie and P V Landshoff, Physics Letters B448 (1999) 281ADSGoogle Scholar
- 10.R D Ball and S Forte, Physics Letters B405 (1997) 317ADSGoogle Scholar
- 11.M Gliick, E Reya and A Vogt, European Physical J C5 (1998) 461; A D Martin, R G Roberts, W J Stirling and R S Thorne, European Physical J C4 (1998) 463; CTEQ collaboration-H.L. La et al, hep-ph/9903282CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 12.R J Eden, P V Landshoff, D I Olive and J C Polkinghorne, The Analytic S-Matrix, Cambridge University Press (1966)Google Scholar
- 13.A Capella, A Kaidalov, C Merino, D Pertermann, and J Tran Thanh Van, European Physical J C5 (1998) 111; E Gotsman, E Levin, U Maor and E Naftali, hep-ph/9904277; K Golec-Biernat and M Wiisthoff, hep-ph/9903358CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 14.B Ermolaev, private communicationGoogle Scholar
- 15.E M Levin, Nuclear Physics B453 (1995) 303ADSGoogle Scholar
- 16.K D Anderson, D A Ross and M G Sotiropoulos, Nuclear Physics B515 (1998) 249ADSGoogle Scholar
- 17.C Lopez and F J Yndurain, Nuclear Physics B183 (1981) 157ADSGoogle Scholar
- 18.A Bassetto, M Ciafaloni and G Marchesini, Nuclear Physics B(1980)477Google Scholar
- 19.T Jaroszewicz, Physics Letters 116B (1982) 291; S Catani and F Hautmann, Nuclear Physics B427 (1994) 475ADSGoogle Scholar
- 20.R K Ellis, F Hautmann and B R Webber, Physics Letters B348 (1995) 582; R S Thorne, hep-ph/9901331ADSGoogle Scholar
- 21.M Ciafaloni, D Colferai and G P Salam, hep-ph/9905566; R D Ball and S Forte, hep-ph/9906222Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000