The CSCW Lab for Groupware Evaluation

  • Renata Mendes de Araujo
  • Flavia M. Santoro
  • Marcos R. S. Borges
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2440)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to report the initiative of a research project called the CSCW Lab. The CSCW Lab is an approach for applying evaluation methodologies in the context of a groupware research group. We identify the major dimensions of groupware evaluation and describe how the CSCW Lab addresses them. The first experiments using CSCW Lab are also described.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Pinelle, D. 2000 A Survey of Groupware Evaluations in CSCW Proceedings. Research Report 00-1, Computer Science Department, University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Pinelle, D., and Gutwin, C., 2000, “A Review of Groupware Evaluations”, Proceedings of Ninth IEEE WETICE 2000 Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, Gaithersburg, Maryland, June.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Knutilla, A.J., Steves, M.P., Allen, R.H., 2000, Workshop on Evaluating Collaborative Enterprises 2000-Workshop Report, as part of the 9th Int. Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, June,National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA. (report available at: http://www.mel.nist.gov/msidlibrary/doc/steves00a.pdf)
  4. [4]
    Steves, M.P., Allen, R.H., 2001, Evaluating Collaborative Enterprises-A Workshop Report, as part of the 10th Int. Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, June, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA. (available at: http://www.mel.nist.gov/msidlibrary/doc/steves01b.pdf)
  5. [5]
    McGrath, J.E., “Methodology Matters: Doing Research in the Behavioral and Social Sciences”. In: Readings in Human-Computer Interaction: Toward the Year 2000, 2nd Ed. Baeker, R.M., Grudin, J., Buxton, W.A.S., Greenberg, S. (eds.), Morgan Kaufman Publishers, San Francisco, 1995, 152–169.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Ramage, M., Twidale, M., Sommerville, I., Evaluation of Cooperative Systems Project, (http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/research/cseg/projects/evaluation/)
  7. [7]
    Dennis, A., Valacich, J.S., 2001, “Conducting Research in Information Systems”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 7, Article 5, July.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Baker, K., Greenberg, S., Gutwin, S., 2001, “Heuristic Evaluation of Groupware Based on the Mechanics of Collaboration”. In: Proceedings of the 8th IFIP Working Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction (EHCI’01), Toronto, Canadá.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Randall, D., Twidale, M., Bentley, R., 1996, “Dealing with Uncertainty-Perspectives on the Evaluation Process”. In: Thomas, P.J. (ed.), CSCW Requirements and Evaluation, Springer.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Baeza-Yates, R., Pino, J.A., 1997, “A First Step to Formally Evaluate Collaborative Work”. In Proceedings of Group 97, Phoenix, USA.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Monk, A., McCarthy, J., Watts, L., Daly-Jones, O., 1996, “Measures of Process”. In: Thomas, P.J. (ed.), CSCW Requirements and Evaluation, Berlin, Springer.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Steves, M.P., Allen, R.H. (2001) Evaluating Collaborative Enterprises-A Workshop Report. WETICE’2001.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    Semiotic Engineering Research Group (SERG)-http://www.serg.inf.puc-rio.br
  15. [15]
    Baker, K., Greenberg, S., Gutwin, C., 2001, “Heuristic Evaluation of Groupware Based on the Mechanics of Collaboration”, Proc. of the 8th IFIP Working Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction, ECHI’01, May 11–13, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Prates, R.O, Souza, C.S., Assis, P.S., “Categorizing communicability evaluation breakdowns in groupware applications”, CHI-SA 2001, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Borges, M.R.S., Pino, J.A., 1999, “Awareness Mechanisms for Coordination in Asynchronous CSCW”. In: Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Information Technology and Systems (WITS’99), Charlotte, North Carolina, EUA, Dec.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Paulk, M.C. et al, 1993, Capability Maturity Model for Software, version 1.1. CMU/SEI-93-TR-24, Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Feb.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Santoro, F.M., 2001, A Cooperation Model for Project-Based Learning. Doctoral Thesis. COPPE Sistemas, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Borges, M.R.S., Pino, J.A., 2000. “Information Technology in Latin America: Two Decades of Collaboration”, Information Technology for Development, V 9 N 3–4, p. 189–204Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Araujo, R.M., Borges, M.R.S., 2001. Extending the Software Process Culture-An Approach Based on Groupware and Workflow. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement PROFES’2001, Kaiserlautern, Germany, September, p. 297–310.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renata Mendes de Araujo
    • 1
  • Flavia M. Santoro
    • 2
  • Marcos R. S. Borges
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento de Ciências da ComputaçãoUFRJ and UNIRIORio de JaneiroBrasil
  2. 2.Departamento de Ciências da ComputaçãoUFRJMexico
  3. 3.Departamento de Ciências da Computação and NCEUFRJMexico

Personalised recommendations