Advertisement

Towards a New Role Paradigm for Object-Oriented Modeling

  • Stéphane Coulondre
  • Thérèse Libourel
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2426)

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the framework of “complex” information systems, related to biology, geographical information, multimedia, etc. Apart from being inherently complex, objects of these domains are evolutive, and related applications require more and more often to take into account this functionality, in the same way that reusability and extensibility currently are.

What does it mean exactly to bring evolution in a formalism as a basic functionality? It means proposing, from the very first step of analysis and modeling, a way to express that future objects will, on one hand be persistent, and on the other hand be able to evolve through their life. This can be realized by allowing them to dynamically gain or loose some pieces of structure or behaviour aspects.

This capability is practically added by taking into account the “role” notion as a complement of the notions of concept or class. In traditional class-based models, an object is linked to a single class (its generating abstract model), according to the mono-instanciation principle, and this class determines the object’s structure and behaviour during its lifespan.

Indeed, some propositions, as that of P. Coad [6], suggested that objects could turn up to play several roles (cf.figure 1), but the role is considered as a concept located on the same level as the class.

Keywords

Object Database Role Hierarchy Animal Class Predator Prey Class Perspective 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. Atwood, D. Barry, J. Dubl, J. Eastman, G. Ferran, D. Jordan, M. Loomis, and D. Wade. The Object Database Standard: ODMG-93. Morgan Kaufmann, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grady Booch, James Rumbaugh, and Ivar Jacobson. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, USA, 1 edition, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Bowman, J. Derrick, P. Linington, and M. Steen. Cross viewpoint consistency in Open Distributed Processing. Software Engineering Journal, 11(1):44–57, January 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. G. G. Cattell, D. Barry, D. Bartels, M. Berler, J. Eastman, S. Gamerman, D. Jordan, A. Springer, H. Strickland, and D. Wade. The Object Database Standard: ODMG 2.0. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Los Altos (CA), USA, 1997.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. G. G. Cattell, D. Barry, M. Berler, J. Eastman, D. Jordan, Craig Russell, Olaf Schadow, Torsten Stanienda, and Fernando Velez. The Object Data Standard: ODMG 3.0. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Los Altos (CA), USA, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Coad. Object-oriented patterns. Communications of the ACM, 35(9):153–159, September 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Coulondre and Th. Libourel. The Samovar Database System. Technical report, LIRMM-Université Montpellier II / C. N. R. S., 2000.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Coulondre and Th. Libourel. An Integrated Object-Role Oriented Database Model. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 42(1):113–141, 2002.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. H. Harrison, H. Kilov, H. L. Ossher, and I. Simmonds. Technical note — from dynamic supertypes to subjects: A natural way to specify and develop systems. IBM Systems Journal, 35(2):244–256, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bent Bruun Kristensen and Kasper Østerbye. Roles: Conceptual abstraction theory and practical language issues. Theory and Practice of Object Systems, 2(3):143–160, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ole Lehrmann Madsen and Birger Møller-Pedersen. Virtual classes: A powerful mechanism in object-oriented programming. In Norman Meyrowitz, editor, OOPSLA’89 Conference Proceedings: Object-Oriented Programming: Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 397–406. ACM Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Martin and J. Odell. Object-Oriented Analysis & Design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1992.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. P. Papazoglou. A methodology for representing multifaced objects. In Proceedings of International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA’91), Berlin, Germany, 1991.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barbara Pernici. Objects with roles. In Proceedings of the Conference on Office Automation Systems, Organizational Data Models, pages 205–215, 1990.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trygve Reenskaug. Working with Objects: The OOram Software Engineering Method. Manning Publications, 1996.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    James Rumbaugh, Ivar Jacobson, and Grady Booch. The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley, Reading,Massachusetts, USA, 1 edition, 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stéphane Coulondre
    • 1
  • Thérèse Libourel
    • 2
  1. 1.LISI, Bât Blaise Pascal (501)INSA de LyonVilleurbanne CedexFrance
  2. 2.LIRMMMontpellier Cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations