Advertisement

Reasoning about Keys for XML

  • Peter Buneman
  • Susan Davidson
  • Wenfei Fan
  • Carmem Hara
  • Wang-Chiew Tan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2397)

Abstract

We study absolute and relative keys for XML, and investigate their associated decision problems. We argue that these keys are important to many forms of hierarchically structured data including XML documents. In contrast to other proposals of keys for XML, these keys can be reasoned about efficiently. We show that the (finite) satisfiability problem for these keys is trivial, and their (finite) implication problem is finitely axiomatizable and decidable in PTIME in the size of keys.

Keywords

Inference Rule Regular Language Path Expression Semistructured Data Implication Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Abiteboul, P. Buneman, and D. Suciu. Data on the Web. From Relations to Semistructured Data and XML. Morgan Kaufman, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Abiteboul, R. Hull, and V. Vianu. Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Abiteboul and V. Vianu. Regular path queries with constraints. Journal of Computer and System Sciences (JCSS), 58(4):428–452, 1999.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Buneman, S. Davidson, W. Fan, C. Hara, and W. Tan. Keys for XML. In WWW 10, 2001.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Buneman, S. Davidson, W. Fan, C. Hara, and W. Tan. Reasoning about absolute and relative keys for XML. Technical Report TUCIS-TR-2001-002, Temple University, 2001.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Buneman, W. Fan, J. Siméon, and S. Weinstein. Constraints for semistructured data and XML. SIGMOD Record, 30(1), 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Buneman, W. Fan, and S. Weinstein. Path constraints on semistructured and structured data. In PODS, 1998.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Buneman, W. Fan, and S. Weinstein. Interaction between path and type constraints. In PODS, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Buneman, W. Fan, and S. Weinstein. Path constraints in semistructured databases. Journal of Computer and System Sciences (JCSS), 61(2):146–193, 2000.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. Fan and L. Libkin. On XML integrity constraints in the presence of DTDs. In PODS, 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Fan and J. Siméon. Integrity constraints for XML. In PODS, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W.H. Freeman and Company, 1979.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. S. Hara and S. B. Davidson. Reasoning about nested functional dependencies. In PODS, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. E. Hopcroft and J. D. Ullman. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation. Addision Wesley, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Hunt, D. Resenkrantz, and T. Szymanski. On the equivalence, containment, and covering problems for the regular and context-free languages. Journal of Computer and System Sciences (JCSS), 12:222–268, 1976.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Ito and G. E. Weddell. Implication problems for functional constraints on databases supporting complex objects. Journal of Computer and System Sciences (JCSS), 50(1):165–187, 1995.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Milo and D. Suciu. Index structures for path expressions. In ICDT, 1999.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke. Database Management Systems. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2000.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Robie, J. Lapp, and D. Schach. XML Query Language (XQL). Workshop on XML Query Languages, Dec. 1998.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. Vianu. A Webodyssey: From Codd to XML. In PODS, 2001.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    W3C. Document Object Model (DOM) Level 1 Specification. Recommendation, Oct. 1998. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-DOM-Level-1/.
  22. 22.
    W3C. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0, Feb 1998. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml.
  23. 23.
    W3C. XML-Data. Note, Jan. 1998. http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/NOTE-XML-data.
  24. 24.
    W3C. XML Path Language (XPath). Working Draft, Nov. 1999. http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath.
  25. 25.
    W3C. XSL Transformations (XSLT). Recommendation, Nov. 1999. http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt.
  26. 26.
    W3C. XML Schema. Working Draft, May 2001. http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema.
  27. 27.
    P. Wadler. A Formal Semantics for Patterns in XSL. Technical report, Computing Sciences Research Center, Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, 2000.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Yu. Regular languages. In G. Rosenberg and A. Salomaa, editors, Handbook of Formal Languages, volume 1, pages 41–110. Springer, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Buneman
    • 1
  • Susan Davidson
    • 1
  • Wenfei Fan
    • 2
  • Carmem Hara
    • 3
  • Wang-Chiew Tan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Bell LaboratoriesMurray HillUSA
  3. 3.Universidade Federal do ParanaCuritiba, PRBrazil

Personalised recommendations