Progress in Discovery Science pp 543-552

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2281)

Discovery of Positive and Negative Knowledge in Medical Databases Using Rough Sets

  • Shusaku Tsumoto
Chapter

Abstract

One of the most important problems on rule induction methods is that extracted rules partially represent information on experts’ decision processes, which makes rule interpretation by domain experts difficult. In order to solve this problem, the characteristics of medical reasoning is discussed, and positive and negative rules are introduced which model medical experts’ rules. Then, for induction of positive and negative rules, two search algorithms are provided. The proposed rule induction method was evaluated on medical databases, the experimental results of which show that induced rules correctly represented experts’ knowledge and several interesting patterns were discovered.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams RD and Victor M: Principles of Neurology, 5th edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buchnan BG and Shortliffe EH(Eds): Rule-Based Expert Systems. Addison-Wesley, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Michalski RS, Mozetic I, Hong J, and Lavrac N: The Multi-Purpose Incremental Learning System AQ15 and its Testing Application to Three Medical Domains. Proceedings of the fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press, Palo Alto CA, pp 1041–1045, 1986.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pawlak Z: Rough Sets. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pawlak Z: Rough Modus Ponens. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems 98, Paris, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Quinlan JR: C4.5-Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, Palo Alto CA, 1993.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Skowron, A. and Grzymala-Busse, J. From rough set theory to evidence theory. In: Yager, R., Fedrizzi, M. and Kacprzyk, J.(eds.) Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, pp.193–236, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shavlik JW and Dietterich TG(Eds): Readings in Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, Palo Alto CA, 1990.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tsumoto S and Tanaka H: Automated Discovery of Medical Expert System Rules from Clinical Databases based on Rough Sets. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 96, AAAI Press, Palo Alto CA, pp.63–69, 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tsumoto S: Modelling Medical Diagnostic Rules based on Rough Sets. In: Polkowski L and Skowron A (Eds): Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, Lecture Note in Artificial Intelligence 1424, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsumoto S: Automated Extraction of Medical Expert System Rules from Clinical Databases based on Rough Set Theory. Journal of Information Sciences, 1998Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsumoto S: Knowledge discovery in clinical databases and evaluation of discovered knowledge in outpatient clinic. Information Sciences, 124, 125–137, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsumoto S: Automated Discovery of Positive and Negative Knowledge in Clinical Databases. IEEE BME Magazine, 19, 56–62, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ziarko W: Variable Precision Rough Set Model. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 46:39–59, 1993.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shusaku Tsumoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medicine InformaticsShimane Medical University, School of MedicineShimaneJapan

Personalised recommendations