Reachability Analysis of Hybrid Systems via Predicate Abstraction

  • Rajeev Alur
  • Thao Dang
  • Franjo Ivančić
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2289)


Predicate abstraction has emerged to be a powerful technique for extracting finite-state models from infinite-state discrete programs. Th is paper presents algorithms and tools for reachability analysis of hybrid systems by combining the notion of predicate abstraction with recent techniques for approximating the set of reachable states of linear systems using polyhedra.Giv en a hybrid system and a set of userde fined boolean predicates, we consider the finite discrete quotient whose states correspond to all possible truth assignments to the input predicates. T he tool performs an on-the-fly exploration of the abstract system. We demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed technique by analyzing a parametric timing-based mutual exclusion protocol and safety of a simple controller for vehicle coordination.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Alur, C. Courcoubetis, N. Halbwachs, T.A. Henzinger, P. Ho, X. Nicollin, A. Olivero, J. Sifakis, and S. Yovine. The algorithmic analysis of hybrid systems. Theoretical Computer Science, 138:3–34, 1995.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Alur, T. Dang, J. Esposito, R. Fierro, Y. Hur, F. Ivančić, V. Kumar, I. Lee, P. Mishra, G. Pappas, and O. Sokolsky. Hierarchical hybrid modeling of embedded systems.In Embedded Software, First Intern. Workshop, LNCS 2211. 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Alur, T. Henzinger, G. Lafferriere, and G. Pappas. Discrete abstractions of hybrid systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Annichini, E. Asarin, and A. Bouajjani. Symbolic techniques for parametric reasoning about counter and clock systems.In Comp. Aided Verification, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Asarin, O. Bournez, T. Dang, and O. Maler. Approximate reachability analysis of piecewise-linear dynamical systems.In Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, Third International Workshop, LNCS 1790, pages 21–31. 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Ball and S. Rajamani. Bebop: A symbolic model checker for boolean programs. In SPIN 2000 Workshop on Model Checking of Software, LNCS 1885. 2000.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Chutinan and B.K. Krogh. Verification of polyhedral-invariant hybrid automata using polygonal flow pipe approximations.In Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, Second International Workshop, LNCS 1569, pages 76–90. 1999.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E.M. Clarke and R.P. Kurshan. Computer-aided verification. IEEE Spectrum, 33(6):61–67, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. C. Corbett, M. B. Dwyer, J. Hatcli., S. Laubach, C.S. Pasareanu, Robby, and H. Zheng. Bandera: Extracting finite-state models from Java source code. In Proceedings of 22nd Intern. Conf. on Software Engineering. 2000.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Das, D. Dill, and S. Park. Experience with predicate abstraction. In Computer Aided Verification, 11th International Conference, LNCS 1633, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Daws, A. Olivero, S. Tripakis, and S. Yovine. The tool kronos.In Hybrid Systems III: Verification and Control, LNCS 1066, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Godbole and J. Lygeros. Longitudinal control of a lead card of a platoon. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 43(4):1125–1135, 1994.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Graf and H. Saidi. Construction of abstract state graphs with PVS. In Proc. 9th Conference on Computer Aided Verification, volume 1254, 1997.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Greenstreet and I. Mitchell. Reachability analysis using polygonal projections. In Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, Second Intern. Workshop, LNCS 1569. 1999.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. Halbwachs, Y. Proy, and P. Raymond. Verification of linear hybrid systems by means of convex approximations.I n Intern. Symposium on Static Analysis, LNCS 864. 1994.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    T.A. Henzinger, P. Ho, and H. Wong-Toi. HyTech: the next generation.In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, pages 56–65, 1995.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. J. Holzmann. The model checker SPIN. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 23(5):279–295, 1997.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    G.J. Holzmann and M.H. Smith. Automating software feature verification. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 5(2):72–87, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Kurzhanski and P. Varaiya. Ellipsoidal techniques for reachability analysis. In Hybrid Systems:Computation and Control, Third Intern. Workshop, LNCS 1790. 2000.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. Larsen, P. Pettersson, and W. Yi. Uppaal in a nutshell. Springer International Journal of Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 1, 1997.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    I. Mitchell and C. Tomlin. Level set methods for computation in hybrid systems.I n Hybrid Systems:Computation and Control, Third Intern. Workshop, volume LNCS 1790. 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Puri and P. Varaiya. Driving safely in smart cars. Technical Report UBC-ITSPRR-95–24, California PATH, University of California in Berkeley, July 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajeev Alur
    • 1
  • Thao Dang
    • 1
  • Franjo Ivančić
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Information ScienceUniversity of PennsylvaniaUSA

Personalised recommendations