Online Hierarchical Graph Drawing

  • Stephen C. North
  • Gordon Woodhull
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2265)

Abstract

We propose a heuristic for dynamic hierarchical graph drawing. Applications include incremental graph browsing and editing, display of dynamic data structures and networks, and browsing large graphs. The heuristic is an on-line interpretation of the static layout algorithm of Sugiyama, Togawa and Toda. It incorporates topological and geometric information with the objective of making layout animations that are incrementally stable and readable through long editing sequences. We measured the performance of a prototype implementation.

References

  1. 1.
    Giuseppe Di Battista, Peter Eades, Roberto Tamassia, and Ioannis G. Tollis. Graph Drawing: algorithms for the visualization of graphs. Prentice-Hall, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Therese Bield and Michael Kaufmann. Area-efficient static and incremental graph drawings. In Proc. 5th European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA’97), volume 1284 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 37–52. Springer-Verlag, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Bohringer and F. Newbery Paulisch. Using constraints to acheive stability in automatic graph layout algorithms. In Proceedings of ACM CHI’90, pages 43–51, 1990.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. S. Bridgeman, J. Fanto, A. Garg, R. Tamassia, and L. Vismara. Interactive Giotto: An algorithm for interactive orthogonal graph drawing. In G. Di Battista, editor, Graph Drawing ‴97, volume 1353 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 303–308, Rome, Italy, 1998. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Schonfeld C. Matuszewski and P. Molitor. Using sifting for k-layer crossing minimization. In Jan Kratochvíl, editor, Graph Drawing ‴99, volume 1731 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 217–224. Springer-Verlag, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Cohen. Drawing graphs to convey proximity: an incremental arrangement method. ACM Trans. on Computer-Human Interfaces, 4(11):197–229, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Dobkin, E. Gansner, E. Koutsofios, and S. North. Implementing a generalpurpose edge router. In G. Di Battista, editor, Graph Drawing ‴97, volume 1353 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Rome, Italy, 1998. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Eades and C. Friedrich. The Marey graph animation tool demo. In Joe Marks, editor, Graph Drawing ‴00, volume 1984 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 396–406. Springer-Verlag, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Eades, W. Lai, K. Misue, and K. Sugiyama. Layout adjustment and the mental map. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 6:183–210, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peter Eades, Robert F. Cohen, and Mao Lin Huang. Online animated graph drawing for web navigation. In G.Di Battista, editor, Graph Drawing’ 97, volume 1353 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Rome, Italy, 1998. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Ellson and S. North. TclDG — a Tcl extension for dynamic graphs. In Proc. 4th USENIX Tcl/Tk Workshop, pages 37–48, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. R. Gansner, E. Koutsofios, S. C. North, and K.-P. Vo. A technique for drawing directed graphs. IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, 19(3):214–230, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Huang and P. Eades. A fully animated interactive system for clustering and navigating huge graphs. In Sue H. Whitesides, editor, Graph Drawing’ 98, volume 1547 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 374–383, Montreal, Canada, 1999. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tamara Munzner. Interactive visualization of large graphs and networks. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Papakostas, J. M. Six, and I. G. Tollis. Experimental and theoretical results in interactive orthogonal graph drawing. In S.C. North, editor, Graph Drawing’ 96, volume 1190 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 101–112, 1997.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Sugiyama, S. Tagawa, and M. Toda. Methods for visual understanding of hierarchical systems. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-11(2):109–125, 1981.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Woodhull and S. North. Montage — an ActiveX container for dynamic interfaces. In Proc. 2nd USENIX Windows NT Symposium, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen C. North
    • 1
  • Gordon Woodhull
    • 1
  1. 1.AT&T Labs - ResearchFlorham ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations