Federated Accounting Management System Architecture for Multimedia Service Usage Management

  • B. Bhushan
  • T. Gringel
  • C. Ryan
  • E. Leray
  • E. de Leastar
  • J. Cloney
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2496)


Service consumers are increasingly becoming aware of QoS and service subscriptions. Service providers (SPs) are also recognizing the opportunity to generate revenue by bundling services in packages and providing them to customers. Standardization bodies have begun to address requirements of charging and usage accounting management as SPs are increasingly relying on them. Federated accounting management concept stems from these developments. It specifically supports the requirement of SPs to co-operate in a federated manner and share the revenue. It also supports the requirements of charging and billing being subcontracted to a third-party. This paper proposes that standard-based interfaces and shared information model, and a well-accepted development methodology are keys to enabling co-operation between SPs. It presents a requirement analysis and a federated accounting management system architecture, which are based on the recommendations laid down by TMForum, IPDR, OMG and IETF organisations. The architecture supports mediation, rating, charges aggregation, settlement, and online billing.


Composite Service Service Mediation Payment Settlement Requirement Analysis Model Shared Information Schema 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Varshney, et al, “Voice Over IP”, Communications of ACM, Jan 2002,Vol 45,No 1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartholome, Lloyd, et al, “A Practical Approach For Implementing E-Commerce Programs in Business School”, Communications of ACM, January 2002, Vol. 45, No. 1.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Howard-Healy, “Billing the future of content”, Billing, Issue 7, September/October 2000.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Browne, “Have you got money to burn?”, Telecommunications International, Aug 2001.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Whitworth, “The Unknown World of 3G Tariffs” Telecommunications International, Feb 2001.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dobson “The SLA Battleground”, Telecommunications International, March 2002.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Telecom Operations Map, Approved Version 2.1, TeleManagementForum, March 2000.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    TMForum GB921: “eTOM: The Business Process Framework For The Information and Communication Services Industry”, Members Evaluation Version 2.0, October 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Network Data Management-Usage (NDM-U): For IP-based Service, Version 2.6, October 2001, IPDR Organisation.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    RFC 2924: Accounting Attributes and Record Format, Category: Informational, Authors: N. Brownlee, A. Blount, September 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    RFC 3127: Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting: Protocol Evaluation, Category: Informational, Authors: Mitton, Johns, Barkley, Nelson, Patil, June 2001.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bharat Bhushan, et al, “Federated Accounting: Service Charging and Billing in a Business-to-Business Environment”, IM2001: 2001 IEEE/IFIP International Symposium on Integrated Network Management Proceedings, Seattle, May 2001.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huston, Geoff, “Interconnection, Peering and Settlements: Part-I”, The Internet Protocol Journal, Volume 2, Number 1, March 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Bhushan
    • 1
  • T. Gringel
    • 1
  • C. Ryan
    • 2
  • E. Leray
    • 2
  • E. de Leastar
    • 2
  • J. Cloney
    • 2
  1. 1.Fraunhofer-FOKUSBerlinGermany
  2. 2.TSSGGround Floor Unit AWaterfordIreland

Personalised recommendations