Trust Management and Whether to Delegate
Trust Management systems use security credentials to determine whether action requests are authorized. This paper examines how they might be used in determining whether requests for delegation are safe.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.T. Aura and C Ellison. Privacy and accountability in certificate systems. Technical Report HUT-TCS-A61, Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory for Theoretical Computer Science, 2000.Google Scholar
- 2.T. Beth, M. Borcherding, and H. Klein. Valuation of trust in open networks. In European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, LNCS 875. Springer Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar
- 3.M Blaze et al. The keynote trust-management system version 2. September 1999. Internet Request For Comments 2704.Google Scholar
- 4.C Ellison et al. Spki certificate theory. September 1999. Internet Request for Comments: 2693.Google Scholar
- 5.S.N. Foley, T.B. Quillinan, J.P. Morrison, D.A. Power, and J.J. Kennedy. Exploiting KeyNote in WebCom: Architecture neutral glue for trust management. In Proceedings of The Fifth Nordic Workshop on Secure IT Systems, Reykjavik, Iceland, Oct 2001.Google Scholar
- 6.J.K. Millen and R.N. Wright. Reasoning about trust and insurance in a public key infrastructure. In Computer Security Foundations Workshop. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2000.Google Scholar
- 7.John P. Morrison and David A. Power. Master promotion and client redirection in the webcom system. In PDPTA, Las Vegas USA, 2000.Google Scholar
- 8.J.P. Morrison, D.A. Power, and J.J. Kennedy. A Condensed Graphs Engine to Drive Metacomputing. Proceedings of the international conference on parallel and distributed processing techniques and applications (PDPTA’ 99), Las Vagas, Nevada, June 28-July 1, 1999.Google Scholar
- 10.I Watson and F Marir. Case based reasoning review. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 9(4), 1994.Google Scholar
- 11.P. Zimmermann. The Official PGP Users Guide. MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar