MICCAI 2002: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI 2002 pp 540-547 | Cite as
Model Library for Deformable Model-Based Segmentation of 3-D Brain MR-Images
Conference paper
First Online:
Abstract
A novel method to use model libraries in segmentation is introduced. Using similarity measures one model from a model library is selected. This model is then used in model-based segmentation. The proposed method is simple, straightforward and fast. Various similarity measures, both voxel and edge measures, were examined. Two different segmentation methods were used for validating the functionality of the proposed procedure. Results show that a statistically significant improvement in segmentation accuracy was achieved in each study case.
Keywords
Similarity Measure Mutual Information Target Volume Segmentation Method Normalize Mutual Information
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Download
to read the full conference paper text
References
- 1.T. McInerney, D. Terzopoulos. Deformable Models in Medical Image Analysis: a Survey. Medical Image analysis, 1(2): 91–108, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.T.F. Cootes, C.J. Taylor. Statistical models of appearance for medical image analysis and computer vision. Proc. SPIE, 2001.Google Scholar
- 3.A. Kelemen, G. Székely, G. Gerig. Elastic Model-Based Segmentation of 3-D Neuroradiological Data Sets. IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol 18(10):828–839, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Y. Wang, L.H. Staib. Elastic Model Based Non-Rigid Registration Incorporating Statistical Shape Information. Proc. MICCAI 1998, 1162–1173, 1998.Google Scholar
- 5.R.D. Davies, T.F. Cootes, J.C. Waterton, C.J. Taylor. An Efficient Method for Constructing Optimal Statistical Shape Models. Proc. MICCAI 2001, 57–65, 2001.Google Scholar
- 6.D. Rueckert, A.F. Frangi, J.A. Schnabel. Automatic Construction of 3D Statistical Deformation Models Using Non-rigid Registration. Proc. MICCAI 2001, 77–84, 2001.Google Scholar
- 7.B. Moghaddam, A. Pentland. Face Recognition using View-Based and Modular Eigenspaces. Automatic Systems for the Identification and Inspection of Humans, SPIE, vol 2277, July 1994.Google Scholar
- 8.S. Sclaroff, A.P. Pentland. Modal Matching for Correspondence and Recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol 17(6): 545–561, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.D.L.G. Hill, D.J. Hawkes. Across-Modality Registration Using Intensity-Based Cost Functions. Handbook of Medical Imaging Processing and Analysis, I.N. Bankman ed., Academic Press, 2000.Google Scholar
- 10.M. Holden, D.L.G. Hill, E.R.E. Denton, J.M. Jarosz, T.C.S. Cox, T. Rohlfing, J. Goodey, D.J. Hawkes. Voxel Similarity Measures for 3-D Serial MR Brain Image Registration. IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol 19(2): 94–102, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.A. Roche, G. Malandain, X. Pennec, N. Ayache. Multimodal Image Registration by Maximation of the Correlation Ratio. Rapport de recherche, INRIA, 1998.Google Scholar
- 12.C. Studholme, D.L.G. Hill, D.J. Hawkes. An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment. Pattern Recognition, 32(1): 71–86, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.J. Astola, I. Virtanen. Entropy correlation coefficient. A measure of statistical dependence for categorized data. Proc. Univ. Vaasa, Discussion Papers, 44, 1982.Google Scholar
- 14.J.P. Pluim, J.B.A. Maintz, M.A. Viergever. Image Registration by Maximation of Combined Mutual Information and Gradient Information. IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol 19(8): 809–814, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.J. Lötjönen, T. Mäkelä. Elastic matching using a deformation sphere. Proc. MICCAI 2001, 541–548, 2001.Google Scholar
- 16.J. Lötjönen, P-J. Reissman, I.E. Magnin, T. Katila. Model extraction from magnetic resonance voluma data using the deformable pyramid. Medical Image Analysis, vol. 3(4): 387–406, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002