A Temporal Description Logic for Reasoning over Conceptual Schemas and Queries
Conference paper
First Online:
- 19 Citations
- 668 Downloads
Abstract
This paper introduces a new logical formalism, intended for temporal conceptual modelling, as a natural combination of the well-known description logic \( \mathcal{D}\mathcal{L}\mathcal{R} \)and point-based linear temporal logic with Since and Until.We define a query language (where queries are non-recursive Datalog programs and atoms are complex \( \mathcal{D}\mathcal{L}\mathcal{R}_{\mathcal{U}\mathcal{S}} \) expressions) and investigate the problem of checking query containment under the constraints defined by \( \mathcal{D}\mathcal{L}\mathcal{R}_{\mathcal{U}\mathcal{S}} \) conceptual schemas—i.e., \( \mathcal{D}\mathcal{L}\mathcal{R}_{\mathcal{U}\mathcal{S}} \) knowledge bases—as well as the problems of schema satisfiability and logical implication.
Keywords
Temporal Logic Description Logic Conceptual Schema Atomic Formula Logical Implication
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.S. Abiteboul, L. Herr, and J. Van den Bussche. Temporal versus first-order logic to query temporal databases. In Proc. of the 15th ACMSIGACT SIGMOD SIGART Sym. on Principles of Database Systems (PODS’96), pages 49–57, 1996.Google Scholar
- 2.A. Artale and E. Franconi. Reasoning with enhanced temporal entity-relationship models. In Proc. of the InternationalWorkshop on Spatio-Temporal Data Models and Languages. IEEE Computer Society Press, August 1999.Google Scholar
- 3.A. Artale and E. Franconi. Temporal ER modeling with description logics. In Proc. ofthe International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER’99). Springer-Verlag, November 1999.Google Scholar
- 4.A. Artale and E. Franconi. A survey of temporal extensions of description logics. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 30(1–4), 2001.Google Scholar
- 5.F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P. F. Patel-Schneider, editors. Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
- 6.A. Borgida and R. J. Brachman. Conceptual modelling with description logics. In Baader et al. [5].Google Scholar
- 7.A. Borgida, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati. Description logics for databases. In Baader et al. [5].Google Scholar
- 8.A. Calì D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, and M. Lenzerini. A formal framework for reasoning on UML class diagrams. In Proc. of the 13th Int. Sym. on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (ISMIS 2002), 2002.Google Scholar
- 9.D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, and M. Lenzerini. On the decidability of query containment under constraints. In Proc. of the 17th ACM SIGACT SIGMOD SIGART Sym. on Principles of Database Systems (PODS’98), pages 149–158, 1998.Google Scholar
- 10.D. Calvanese, M. Lenzerini, and D. Nardi. Description logics for conceptual data modeling. In Chomicki and Saake [13].Google Scholar
- 11.D. Calvanese, M. Lenzerini, and D. Nardi. Unifying class-based representation formalisms. J. of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11:199–240, 1999.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 12.J. Chomicki. Temporal query languages: a survey. In Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Temporal Logic (ICTL’94), pages 506–534, 1994.Google Scholar
- 13.J. Chomicki and G. Saake, editors. Logics for Databases and Information Systems. Kluwer, 1998.Google Scholar
- 14.J. Chomicki and D. Toman. Temporal logic in information systems. In Chomicki and Saake [13], chapter 1.Google Scholar
- 15.E. Franconi, F. Grandi, and F. Mandreoli. A semantic approach for schema evolution and versioning in object-oriented databases. In Proc. of the 1st International Conf. on Computational Logic (CL’2000), DOOD stream. Springer-Verlag, July 2000.Google Scholar
- 16.E. Franconi and G. Ng. The ICOM tool for intelligent conceptual modelling. In Proc. of the 7th International Workshop on Knowledge Representation meets Databases (KRDB’2000), 2000.Google Scholar
- 17.D. Gabbay, A. Kurucz, F. Wolter, and M. Zakharyaschev. Many-dimensional modal logics: theory and applications. Studies in Logic. Elsevier, 2002. To appear.Google Scholar
- 18.H Gregersen and J. S. Jensen. Temporal Entity-Relationship models-a survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 11(3):464–497, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.I. Hodkinson, F. Wolter, and M. Zakharyaschev. Decidable fragments of first-order temporal logics. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 106:85–134, 2000.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 20.M. Jarke, C. Quix, D. Calvanese, M. Lenzerini, E. Franconi, S. Ligoudistiano, P. Vassiliadis, and Y. Vassiliou. Concept based design of data warehouses: The DWQ demonstrators. In 2000 ACM SIGMOD Intl. Conference on Management of Data, 2000.Google Scholar
- 21.K. Schild. Combining terminological logics with tense logic. In Proceedings of the 6th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, EPIA’93, October 1993.Google Scholar
- 22.S. Spaccapietra, C. Parent, and E. Zimanyi. Modeling time from a conceptual perspective. In Int. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM98), 1998.Google Scholar
- 23.H. Sturm and F. Wolter. A tableau calculus for temporal description logic: the expanding domain case. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2002. To appear.Google Scholar
- 24.P. van Emde Boas. The convenience of tiling. Technical Report CT-96-01, ILLC—Univ. ofAmsterdam, 1996.Google Scholar
- 25.F. Wolter and M. Zakharyaschev. Satisfiability problem in description logics with modal operators. In Proc. of the 6 th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’98), pages 512–523, Trento, Italy, June 1998.Google Scholar
- 26.F. Wolter and M. Zakharyaschev. Modal description logics: Modalizing roles. Fundamenta Informaticae, 39(4):411–438, 1999.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 27.F. Wolter and M. Zakharyaschev. Multi-dimensional description logics. In Proc. of IJCAI’99, pages 104–109, 1999.Google Scholar
- 28.F. Wolter and M. Zakharyaschev. Temporalizing description logics. In D. Gabbay and M. de Rijke, editors, Frontiers of Combining Systems, pages 379–401. Studies Press-Wiley, 1999.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002