Towards an Improved Readability on Mobile Devices: Evaluating Adaptive Rapid Serial Visual Presentation

  • Gustav Öquist
  • Mikael Goldstein
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2411)


Can readability on small screens be improved by using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) that adapts the presentation speed to the characteristics of the text? In this paper we introduce Adaptive RSVP and also report findings from a usability evaluation where the ability to read long and short texts on a mobile device was assessed. In a balanced repeated-measurement experiment employing 16 subjects two variants of Adaptive RSVP were benchmarked against Fixed RSVP and traditional text presentation. For short texts all RSVP formats increased reading speed by 33% with no significant differences in comprehension or task load. For long texts no differences were found in reading speed or comprehension but all RSVP formats increased task load significantly. Nevertheless, Adaptive RSVP improved task load ratings for most factors compared to Fixed RSVP. Causes, implications and effects of these findings are discussed.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Björnsson, C.H. (1968). Läsbarhet, Stockholm, Liber.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruijn, O. and Spence, R. (2000). Rapid Serial Visual Presentation: A space-time trade-off in information presentation. In Proceedings of Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI’2000.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castelhano, M.S. and Muter, P. (2001). Optimizing the reading of electronic text using rapid serial visual presentation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(4), 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duchnicky, R.L. and Kolers, P.A. (1983). Readability of text scrolled on visual display terminals as a function of window size. Human Factors, 25, 683–692.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ericsson, T., Chincholle, D. and Goldstein, M. (2001). Both the device and the service influence WAP usability, IHM-HCI2001, Volume II, Usability in Practice by J. Vanderdonckt, A. Blandford and A. Derycke (Eds.), Short paper, 10–14 September, Lille, France, 79–85.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Forster, K.I. (1970). Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Percep. Psychophys. 8, 215–221.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldstein, M., Sicheritz, K. and Anneroth, M. (2001). Reading from a small display using the RSVP technique. Nordic Radio Symposium, NRS01.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldstein, M., Öqvist, G., Bayat-M, M., Ljungstrand, P. and Björk, S. (2001). Enhancing the reading experience: Using adaptive and sonified RSVP for reading on small displays. Proceedings of Workshop on Mobile Devices at IHM-HCI 2001, Lille, September 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hart, S.G. and Staveland, L.E. (1988). Development of Nasa-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Human Mental Workload, by P.A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (eds.). Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V.: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Joula, J.F., Ward, N.J. and MacNamara, T. (1982). Visual search and reading of rapid serial presentations of letter strings, words and text. J. Exper. Psychol.: General, 111, 208–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Juola, J.F., Tiritoglu, A., and Pleunis, J. (1995). Reading text presented on a small display. Applied Ergonomics, 26, 227–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Just, M. A., and Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, Vol. 87, No. 4, pp. 329–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A. and Masson, M.E.J. (1982). What eye fixations tell us about speed-reading and skimming. (Eye-lab Technical Report) Carnegie-Mellon University.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kang, T.J., and Muter, P. (1989). Reading Dynamically Displayed Text. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1989, Vol. 8, No. 1, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Masson, MEJ. (1983). Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading. Memory and Cognition, 11: 262–274.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCrickard, D.S., Catrambone R. and Stasko, J.T. (2001). Evaluating Animation in the Periphery as a Mechanism for Maintaining Awareness. In proceedings of INTERACT 2001, 148–156.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mills, C.B. and Weldon, L.J. (1987). Reading text from computer screens. ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 19, No. 4, ACM Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Muter, P. and Maurutto, P. (1991). Reading and skimming from computer screens and books: The paperless office revisited? Behavior & Information Technology, 10, 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Muter, P. (1996). Interface Design and Optimization of Reading of Continuous Text. In Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing. H. van Oostendorp and S. de Mul (Eds.). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Potter, M.C. (1984). Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP): A method for studying language processing. In New Methods in Reading Comprehension Research. Kieras, D.E. and Just, M.A. (Eds.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rahman, T. and Muter, P. (1999). Designing an interface to optimize reading with small display windows. Human Factors, Vol. 1, No. 1, 106–117, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Robeck, M.C. and Wallace, R.R. (1990). The Psychology of Reading: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, Second Edition.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tekfi, C. (1987). Readability Formulas: An Overview, Journal of Documentation 43(3) 261–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance, 2nd edition, Chapter 8, Harper Collins Publishers Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Öqvist, G. (2001). Adaptive Rapid Serial Visual Presentation. Master’s Thesis, Department of Linguistics, Uppsala University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gustav Öquist
    • 1
  • Mikael Goldstein
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Usability & Interaction LabEricsson ResearchKistaSweden

Personalised recommendations