Strict Compositionality and Literal Movement Grammars
The principle of compositionality, as standardly defined, regards grammars as compositional that are not compositional in an intuitive sense of the word. There is, for example, no notion of a part of a string or structure involved in the formal definition. We shall therefore propose here a stricter version of compositionality. It consists in a conjunction of principles which assure among other that complex signs are in a literal sense made from simpler signs, with the meaning and syntactic type being computed in tandem. We shall argue that given this strict principle, quite powerful string handling mechanisms must be assumed. Linear Context Free Rewrite Systems (see ) are not enough to generate human languages, but most likely Literal Movement Grammars will do.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Boeder, W. Suffixaufnahme in Kartvelian. In Plank, F., editor, Double Case. Agreement by Suffixaufnahme, pages 151–215. Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
- 3.Dench, A. Suffixaufnahme and Apparent Ellipsis in Martuthunira. In Plank, F., editor, Double Case. Agreement by Suffixaufnahme, pages 380–395. Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
- 4.Evans, N. D. A Grammar of Kayardild. With Historical-Comparative Notes on Tangkic. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 1995.Google Scholar
- 5.Groenink, A. Surface without Structure. Word order and tractability issues in natural language processing. Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht University, 1997.Google Scholar
- 6.Janssen, T. Compositionality. In van Benthem, J. and A. ter Meulen, editors, Handbook of Logic and Language, pages 417–473. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997.Google Scholar
- 9.Moortgat, M. Generalized quantifiers and discontinuous type constructors.In Sijtsma, W. and A. van Horck, editors, Discontinuous Constituency. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993.Google Scholar
- 10.Pollard, C. J. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Head Grammars and Natural Language. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 1984.Google Scholar
- 11.Radzinski, D. Chinese Number Names, Tree Adjoining Languages, and Mild Context-Sensitivity. In Computational Linguistics, 17:277–299, 1991.Google Scholar
- 12.Rambow, O. Formal and Computational Aspects of Natural Language Syntax. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1994.Google Scholar