Investigating Active Pattern Recognition in an Imitative Game

  • Sorin Moga
  • Philippe Gaussier
  • Mathias Quoy
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2085)

Abstract

In imitation learning processes, the ”student” robot must be able to perceive the environment and to detect one ”teacher”. In our approach of learning by imitation, we consider that the student tries to learn the teacher trajectory (temporal pattern). In this context, we propose a neural architecture for a mobile robot which detects its teacher using the optical flow information. The detected flow is used to initiate the imitative game. The main idea consists in using a pattern recognition system in order to allow the student to continue its imitative game even if the teacher is stopped. Since the movement detection and the pattern recognition systems work in parallel, they can provide different answers with different time constant. Neural fields equations are used to merge these information and to allow a stable dynamical behavior of the robot. Moreover, the stability of the decision making allows the robot to online learn to recognize the teacher from one image to the next.

Keywords

Mobile Robot Movement Detection Local View Pattern Recognition System Movement Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Amari. Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fields. Biological Cybernetics, 27:77–87, 1977.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Andry, S. Moga, P. Gaussier, A. Revel, and J. Nadel. Imitation: learning and communication. In The Society for Adaptive Behavior SAB’2000, pages 353–362, Paris, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Boucart. La reconnaissance des objets. Presses universitaires de Grenoble, Grenoble, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Gaussier, S. Moga, J.P. Banquet, and M. Quoy. From perception-action loops to imitation processes: A bottom-up approach of learning by imitation. In Socially Intelligent Agents, pages 49–54, Boston, 1997. AAAI fall symposium.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Gaussier, S. Moga, M. Quoy, and J.P. Banquet. From perception-action loops to imitation processes: a bottom-up approach of learning by imitation. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 12(7-8):701–727, Oct-Dec 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Nadel. The Functionnal Use of Imitation in Preverbal Infants and Nonverbal Children With Autism. Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Quoy, S. Moga, P. Gaussier, and A. Revel. Parallelization of neural networks using pvm. In J. Dongarra, P. Kacsuk, and N. Podhorszki, editors, Recent Advances in Parallel Virtual Machine and Message Passing Interface, pages 289–296, Berlin, 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, no 1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Schöner, M. Dose, and C. Engels. Dynamics of behavior: theory and applications for autonomous robot architectures. Robotics and Autonomous System, 16(2-4):213–245, December 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sorin Moga
    • 1
  • Philippe Gaussier
    • 1
  • Mathias Quoy
    • 1
  1. 1.ETIS / CNRS 8051A, Groupe Neurocybernetique ENSEACergy-PontoiseFrance

Personalised recommendations