Modeling Processes and Workflows by Business Rules

  • Gerhard Knolmayer
  • Rainer Endl
  • Marcel Pfahrer
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1806)

Abstract

This contribution describes a rule-based method for modeling business processes and workflows. Business rules are defined as statements about guidelines and restrictions with respect to states and processes in an organization. After introducing an extended Event-Condition-Action (ECA) notation, an approach for the refinement of business rules is developed in order to achieve a consistent decomposition of the business processes. Thus, ECA rules serve as an integration layer between different process modeling and (workflow) specification languages. Finally, we propose an architecture of a rule-oriented repository supporting the modeling and refinement process.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [AaHe97]
    van der Aalst, W.; van Hee, K.M.: Workflow Management: Modellen, Methoden en Systemen, Schoonhoven: Academic Service 1997.Google Scholar
  2. [BBG+90]
    Bell, J.; Brooks, D.; Goldbloom, E.; Sarro, R.; Wood, J.: Re-Engineering Case Study-Analysis of Business Rules and Recommendations for Treatment of Rules in a Relational Database Environment, Bellevue Golden: US West Information Technologies Group 1990.Google Scholar
  3. [BeRS95]
    Becker, J.; Rosemann, M.; Schütte, R.: Grundsätze ordnungsmäßiger Modellierung, in: Wirtschaftsinformatik 37 (1995) 5, pp. 435–445.Google Scholar
  4. [Daya88]
    Dayal, U.: Active Database Management Systems, in: C. Beeri, J.W. Schmidt, U. Dayal (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Data and Knowledge Bases, San Matheo: Morgan Kaufmann 1988, pp. 150–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [dPLL98]
    do Prado Leite, J.C.S.; Leonardi, M.C.: Business rules as organizational policies, in: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Software Specification and Design, Los Alamitos: IEEE Comput. Soc. 1998, pp. 68–76.Google Scholar
  6. [EnMe99]
    Endl, R.; Meyer, M.: Potential of Business Process Modeling with regard to available Workflow Management Systems, in: B. Scholz-Reiter; H.-D. Stahlmann; A. Nethe (Eds.): Process Modelling, Berlin: Springer 1999.Google Scholar
  7. [Gatz95]
    Gatziu, S.: Events in an Active, Object-Oriented Database System, Hamburg: Dr. Kovac 1995.Google Scholar
  8. [GrSc98]
    Gruhn, V., Schneider, M.: Workflow Management based on Process Model Repositories, in: IEEE Computer Society (Ed.), 1998 International Conference on Software Engineering, Los Alamitos 1998, pp. 379–388.Google Scholar
  9. [Herb97]
    Herbst, H.: Business Rule-Oriented Conceptual Modeling, Heidelberg: Physica 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [HeKn95]
    Herbst, H.; Knolmayer, G.: Ansätze zur Klassifikation von Geschäftsregeln, in: Wirtschaftsinformatik 37 (1995) 2, pp. 149–159.Google Scholar
  11. [HeKn96]
    Herbst, H.; Knolmayer, G.: Petri nets as derived process representations in the BROCOM approach, in: Wirtschaftsinformatik 38 (1996) 4, pp. 391–398.Google Scholar
  12. [HeMy97]
    Herbst, H.; Myrach, T.: A Repository System for Business Rules, in: R. Meersman, L. Mark (Eds.), Database Application Semantics, London: Chapman & Hall 1997, pp. 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [HoPf99]
    Hoheisel, H.; Pfahrer, M.: Ein temporales Regel-Repository zur Unterstützung evolutionärer Workflow-Modellierung, in: A.-W. Scheer; M. Nüttgens (Eds.): Electronic Business Engineering, Heidelberg: Physica 1999, pp. 565–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [Jabl95]
    Jablonski, S.: Anforderungen an die Modellierung von Workflows, in: H. Österle; P. Vogler (Eds.): Praxis des Workflow-Managements-Grundlagen, Vorgehen, Beispiele, Wiesbaden: Vieweg 1995.Google Scholar
  15. [KiRo94]
    Kilov, H.; Ross, J.: Information Modeling, An Object-Oriented Approach, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall 1994.MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [KEPS97]
    Knolmayer, G.; Endl, R.; Pfahrer, M.; Schlesinger, M.: Geschäftsregeln als Instrument zur Modellierung von Geschäftsprozessen und Workflows, SWORDIES Report 97-8, Bern 1997.Google Scholar
  17. [Knol98]
    Knolmayer, G.F.: Business Rules Layers Between Process and Workflow Modeling: An Object-Oriented Perspective, in: S. Demeyer; J. Bosch (Eds.), Object-Oriented Technology, Berlin: Springer 1998, pp. 205–207.Google Scholar
  18. [MoGR93]
    Morgan, C.C.; Gardiner, H.B.; Robinson, K.A.: On the Refinement Calculus, Berlin: Springer 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [MWBG98]
    Mens, K.; Wuyts, R.; Bontridder, D.; Grijseels, A.: Workshop Report-ECOOP’98 Workshop 7: Tools and Environments for Business Rules, in: S. Demeyer; J. Bosch (Eds.): Object-Oriented Technology, Berlin: Springer 1998, pp. 189–196.Google Scholar
  20. [NiHa89]
    Nijssen, G.M.; Halpin, T.A.: Conceptual Schema and Relational Database Design: A fact oriented approach, New York et al.: Prentice Hall 1989.Google Scholar
  21. [Ober96]
    Oberweis, A.: Modellierung und Ausführung von Workflows mit Petri-Netzen, Stuttgart, Leipzig: Teubner 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [Padb96]
    Padberg, J.: Abstract Petri Nets: Uniform Approach and Rule-Based Refinement, Ph.D. Thesis TU Berlin 1996, http://www.cs.tu-berlin.de/~padberg/Publications/Year96/AbstrPetriNetze.ps.gz.
  23. [Sche92]
    Scheer, A.-W.: Business Process Engineering-Reference Models for Industrial Companies, 2nd Edition, Berlin et al.: Springer Verlag 1994.MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [Wirt71]
    Wirth, N.: Program Development by Stepwise Refinement, in: Communications of the ACM 14 (1971) 4, pp. 221–227.Google Scholar
  25. [ZaAz97]
    Zarri, G.P.; Azzam, S.: Building up and making use of corporate knowledge repositories, in: E. Plaza, R. Benjamins (Eds.), Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, 10th European Workshop, EKAW’ 97, Berlin: Springer 1997, pp. 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerhard Knolmayer
    • 1
  • Rainer Endl
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marcel Pfahrer
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Information SystemsUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.igim agSt. GallenSwitzerland
  3. 3.Urs Sauter + Marcel Pfahrer AGBielSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations