Domain-Specific Metadata a Key for Building Semantically-Rich Schema Models

  • Abdel-Rahman Tawil H. 
  • Nicholas J. Fiddian
  • William A. Gray
Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2224)

Abstract

Providing integrated access to data from many diverse and heterogeneous Information Servers (ISs) requires deep knowledge, not only about the structure of the data represented at each server, but also about the commonly occurring differences in the intended semantics of this data. Unfortunately, very often there is a lack of such knowledge and the local schemas, being semantically weak as a consequence of the limited expressiveness of traditional data models, do not help the acquisition of this knowledge. In this paper we propose domain-specific metadata as a key for upgrading the semantic level of the local ISs to which an integration system requires access, and for building semantically-rich schema models. We provide a framework for enriching the individual IS schemas with semantic domain knowledge to make explicit the assumptions which may have been made by their designers, are of interest to the integrator (interpreter or user), and which may not be captured using the DDL language of their host servers. The enriched schema semantic knowledge is organised by levels of schematic granularity: database, schema, attribute and instance levels giving rise to semantically-rich schema models.

Keywords

Semantic interoperability mediators domain ontologies schema enrichment 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Y. Arens, C. Y. Chee, C. Hsu, and C. A. Knoblock. Retrieving and integrating data from multiple information sources. International Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems, 2(2):127–158, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    P. Buneman, L. Raschid, and J. Ullman. Mediator languages — a proposal for a standard. Report of an I3/POB Working Group held at the University of Maryland, ftp://ftp.umiacs.umd.edu/pub/ONRrept/medmodel96.ps, April 1996.
  3. [3]
    R.G. Cattel and Morgan Kufmann. ODMG-93 The Object Database Standard Release 1.2. Inc., San Francisco, California, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Vinary K. Chaudhri, Adam Farquhar, Richard Fikes, Peter D. Karp, and James P. Rice. OKBC: A programmatic foundation for knowledge base interoperability. AAAI-98, pages 26–30, July 1998.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J Chisholm. The read clinical classification. British Medical Journal, page 1092, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Rehab M. Duwairi. Views for Interoperability in a Heterogeneous Object-Oriented Multidatabase System. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Wales College of Cardiff, April 1997.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Genesereth and R. Fikes. Knowledge Interchange Format. Technical report, Stanford University, June 1992.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    C. H. Goh, S. Bressan, S. Madnick, and M. Siegel. Context interchange: New features and formalisms for the intelligent integration of information. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 17(3):270–293, July 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. D. Karunaratna, W. A. Gray, and N. J. Fiddian. Establishing a knowledge base to assist integration of heterogeneous databases. In Suzanne M. Embury et al, editor, Proceedings of 16th British National Conference on Databases (BNCOD16), LNCS 1405, Springer, pages 103–118, 1998.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Kifer and G. Lauson. F-logic: A higher-order language for reasoning about objects, inheritance and scheme. Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD Conference, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Alon Y. Levy, D. Srivastava, and T. Kirk. Data model and query evaluation in global information systems. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 5(2), 1995.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Munib A. Qutaishat. A Schema Meta-Integration System for a Logically Heterogeneous Distributed Object-Oriented Database Environment. PhD thesis, Department of Computing Mathematics, University of Wales College of Cardiff, 1993.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. Rector, W. Solomon, W. Nowlan, and T. Rush. A terminology server for medical language and medical information systems. Methods of Information in Medicine, 34:147–157, 1995.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    A-R Tawil, W. A. Gray, and N. J. Fiddian. Discovering and representing interschema semantic knowledge in a cooperative multi-information server environment. Proceedings of 11th International Conference and Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA’2000), Greenwich, U.K., September 2000.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    A-R Tawil, W. A. Gray, and N. J. Fiddian. Integration operators for generating user-defined mediator views. Proceedings of 5th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, (SCI’2001) Orlando, Florida, USA, 2001.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    William A. Woods and James G. Schmolze. The KL-ONE family. Computer Math. Applic., 23(2–5):133–177, August 1992.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdel-Rahman Tawil H. 
    • 1
  • Nicholas J. Fiddian
    • 1
  • William A. Gray
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceCardiff UniversityU. K.

Personalised recommendations