Advertisement

Automatic Design of Multivariable QFT Control System via Evolutionary Computation

  • K. C. Tan
  • T. H. Lee
  • E. F. Khor
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1803)

Abstract

This paper proposes a multi-objective evolutionary automated design methodology for multivariable QFT control systems. Unlike existing manual or convex optimisation based QFT design approaches, the ‘intelligent’ evolutionary technique is capable of automatically evolving both the nominal controller and pre-filter simultaneously to meet all performance requirements in QFT, without going through the conservative and sequential design stages for each of the multivariable sub-systems. In addition, it avoids the need of manual QFT bound computation and trial-and-error loop-shaping design procedures, which is particularly useful for unstable or non-minimum phase plants for which stabilising controllers maybe difficult to be synthesised. Effectiveness of the proposed QFT design methodology is validated upon a benchmark multivariable system, which offers a set of low-order Pareto optimal controllers that satisfy all the required closed-loop performances under practical constraints.

Keywords

Sensitivity Rejection Quantitative Feedback Theory Nominal Controller Disturbance Response Loop Transmission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yaniv, O., Horowitz, I.: A Quantitative design method for MIMO linear feedback system having uncertain plants. Int. J. Control, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 401–421, 1986.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yaniv, O., Schwartz, B.: A Criterion for loop stability in the Horowitz Synthesis of MIMO feedback systems. Int. J. Control, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 527–539, 1990.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Houpis, C. H.: Quantitative feedback theory (QFT) technique. In Levine, W. S., ed. (1996). The Control Handbook, CRC Press & IEEE Press, pp. 701–717, 1993.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Snell, S. A., Hess, R. A.: Robust, decoupled, flight control design with rate saturating actuators. Conf. and Exhibit. On AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics, pp. 733–745, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thompson, D. F., and Nwokah, O. D. I.: Analytical loop-shaping methods in quantitative feedback theory, J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, vol. 116, pp. 169–177, 1994.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bryant, G. F., and Halikias, G. D.: Optimal loop-shaping for systems with large parameter uncertainty via linear programming, Int. J. Control, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 557–568, 1995.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chait, Y.: QFT loop-shaping and minimisation of the high-frequency gain via convex optimisation, Proc. Sym. Quantitative Feedback Theory and other Freq. Domain Method and Applications, Glasgow, Scotland, pp. 13–28, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, W. H., Ballance, D. J. Li, Y.: Automatic loop-shaping in QFT using genetic algorithms. Proc. of 3rd Asia-Pacific Conf. on Cont. & Meas., pp. 63–67, 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tan, K. C., Lee, T. H. Khor, E. F.: Control system design automation with robust tracking thumbprint performance using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm”, IEEE Int. Conf. Control Appl. and Sys. Design, Hawaii, 22–26th August, pp. 498–503, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, W. H., Ballance, D. J., Feng, W., and Li, Y.: Genetic algorithm enabled computer-automated design of QFT control systems, IEEE Int. Conf. Control Appl. and Sys. Design, Hawaii, 22-26th August, pp. 492–497, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tan, K. C., Wang, Q. G., Lee, T. H., Khoo, T. T., and Khor, E. F.: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Toolbox for Matlab, (http://vlab.ee.nus.edu.sg/~kctan/moea.htm), 1999.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Skogestad, S., Postlethwaite, I.: Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex. England, 1996.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    The Math Works, Inc.: Using MATLAB, version 5, 1998.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Borghesani, C., Chait, Y. and Yaniv, O.: Quantitative Feedback Theory Toolbox User Manual, The Math Work Inc, 1995.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hanselmann, H.: Automotive control: From concept to experiment to product, IEEE Int. Conf. Contr. Appl. and Sys. Des., Dearborn, 1996.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rebeschieß, S.: MIRCOS-Microcontroller-based real time control system toolbox for use with Matlab/Simulink, IEEE Int. Conf. Contr. Appl. and Sys. Design, Hawaii, USA, pp. 267–272, 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. C. Tan
    • 1
  • T. H. Lee
    • 1
  • E. F. Khor
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations