Robot Localization without Depth Perception
Consider the problem of placing reflectors in a 2-D environment in such a way that a robot equipped with a basic laser can always determine its current location. The robot is allowed to swivel at its current location, using the laser to detect at what angles some reflectors are visible, but no distance information is obtained. A polygonal map of the environment and reflectors is available to the robot. We show that there is always a placement of reflectors that allows the robot to localize itself from any point in the environment, and that such a reflector placement can be computed in polynomial time on a real RAM. This result improves over previous techniques which have up to a quadratic number of ambiguous points at which the robot cannot determine its location [1, 9]. Further, we show that the problem of optimal reflector placement is equivalent to an art-gallery problem within a constant factor.
KeywordsProjective Geometry Depth Perception Cross Ratio Collinear Point Robot Localization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.M. Berger. Geometry, vol. II. Springer-Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar
- 3.M. Betke and L. Gurvits. Mobile robot localization using landmarks. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2, 135–142, 1994.Google Scholar
- 4.G. Dudek, K. Romanik, and S. Whitesides. Localizing a robot with minimum travel. In Proc. 6th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 1995.Google Scholar
- 5.H. Gonzalez-Banos and J. Latombe. A randomized art-gallery algorithm for sensor placement. In Proc. 17th ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, 2001.Google Scholar
- 6.S. T. L. Heath. The thirteen books of Euclid’s Elements translated from the text of Heiberg with introduction and commentary. Dover Publications, New York, 1956.Google Scholar
- 7.L. S. Shively. Introduction to Modern Geometry. John Wiley & Sons, 1939.Google Scholar
- 8.R. Sim and G. Dudek. Mobile robot localization from learned landmarks. In Proc. IEEE/RSJ Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1998.Google Scholar
- 10.O. Veblen and J. W. Young. Projective Geometry, vol. 1. Gin and Company, 1938.Google Scholar