Mathemagics

(A Tribute to L. Euler and R. Feynman)
  • Pierre Cartier
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 550)

Abstract

The implicit philosophical belief of the working mathematician is today the Hilbert-Bourbaki formalism. Ideally, one works within a closed system: the basic principles are clearly enunciated once for all, including (that is an addition of twentieth century science) the formal rules of logical reasoning clothed in mathematical form. The basic principles include precise definitions of all mathematical objects, and the coherence between the various branches of mathematical sciences is achieved through reduction to basic models in the universe of sets. A very important feature of the system is its non-contradiction ; after Gödel, we have lost the initial hopes to establish this non-contradiction by a formal reasoning, but one can live with a corresponding belief in non-contradiction. The whole structure is certainly very appealing, but the illusion is that it is eternal, that it will function for ever according to the same principles. What history of mathematics teaches us is that the principles of mathematical deduction, and not simply the mathematical theories, have evolved over the centuries. In modern times, theories like General Topology or Lebesgue’s Integration Theory represent an almost perfect model of precision, flexibility and harmony, and their applications, for instance to probability theory, have been very successful.

My thesis is: there is another way of doing mathematics, equally successful, and the two methods should supplement each other and not fight.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Borel E. (1902) Leçons sur les séries à termes positifs, Gauthier-VillarsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bourbaki N. (1976) Fonctions d’une variable r’eelle (chapitres 1 à 7). Hermann, edited by Masson since 1980Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bourbaki N. (1984) Eléments d’histoire des mathématiques. MassonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cartier P. (1966) Quantum mechanical relations and theta functions, in Algebraic groups and discontinuous subgroups..Proc. Symp. Pure Maths, vol.IX, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 361–383MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Witt-Morette C., Cartier P. and Folacci P. (editors) (1997) Functional Integration, Basics and Applications, Nato Asi, Series B, vol 361, Plenum PressGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Euler L. (1755) Institutiones calculi differentialis cum ejus usu in analysi infinitorum ac doctrina serierum. Berlin, 1910Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hardy G. H. (1924) Orders of infinity. Cambridge Univ. Press (reprinted by Hafner, New York, 1971)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knopp K. (1964) Theorie und Anwendung der unendlichen Reihen, Springer (5th edition)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Waldschmidt M. et al (1995) From Number Theory to Physics. Springer (see Chapter 1 by P. Cartier: An introduction to zeta functions)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weil A. (1984) Number Theory, An Approach Through History, BirkhäuserGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre Cartier
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.CNRSEcole Normale Supérieure de ParisParis Cedex 05
  2. 2.Institut des Hautes Etudes Scientifiques, Le Bois MarieBures-sur-YvetteFrance

Personalised recommendations