Grid Patterns and Cultural Expectations in Urban Wayfinding

  • Clare Davies
  • Eric Pederson
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2205)

Abstract

Much of the literature on human spatial cognition and language in large-scale environments has been based on ‘simplified’ grid-pattern layouts with orthogonal intersections and parallel paths/streets. However, these are not the prevailing urban structure in many countries. This field study considered the possibility that different cultural expectations for typical urban environments would affect even long-term residents’ mental models and behavior regarding urban wayfinding and locational knowledge. Residents of two grid-pattern cities, one in the UK, where such layouts are rare, and another one in the US, performed a battery of tasks including confidence ratings, sketch map drawing, verbal route directions, and pointing to non-visible landmarks. The results show that the UK group placed less emphasis on the central grid in their sketch maps, and showed a systematic error in their pointing direction. The results are discussed in the light of previous research on orientation biases. Further crosscultural analysis and studies are planned.

Keywords

route directions mental maps cognitive mapping urban navigation cross-cultural psychology pointing tasks landmarks cardinal directions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, G.L.: From knowledge to words to wayfinding: issues in the production and comprehension of route directions. In: Hirtle, S.C. and Frank, A.U. (eds.): Spatial Information Theory: a theoretical basis for GIS. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1329. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1997) 363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Canter, D.: The psychology of place. The Architectural Press Ltd., London (1977)Google Scholar
  3. Cornell, E.H. and Heth, C.D.: Route learning and wayfinding. In: Kitchin, R. and Freundschuh, S. (eds.): Cognitive Mapping: past, present and future. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, London and New York (2000) 66–83Google Scholar
  4. Downs, R.M. and Stea, D.: Maps in minds: reflections on cognitive mapping. Harper and Row, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  5. Ellis, S.J. and Cornish, I.M.: Length of residence and knowledge of locations in the city. The Journal of Social Psychology 137 (1997) 133–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Freundschuh, S.: Is there a relationship between spatial cognition and environmental patterns? Lecture Notes In Computer Science, Vol. 639. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1992) 288–304Google Scholar
  7. Hirtle, S.C. and Heidorn, P.B.: The structure of cognitive maps: representations and processes. In: Gärling, T. and Golledge, R.G. (eds.): Behavior and Environment: psychological and geographical approaches. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1993) 170–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kitchin, R.M.: Methodological convergence in cognitive mapping research: investigating configurational knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology 16 (1996) 163–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Levine, M., Marchon, I. and Hanley, G.: The placement and misplacement of you-are-here maps. Environment and Behavior 16 (1984) 139–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Levinson, S.C.: Frames of reference and Molyneux’s Question: crosslinguistic evidence. In: Bloom, P., Peterson, M.A., Nadel, L. and Garrett, M.F. (eds.): Language and Space. MIT Press/‘A Bradford Book’, Cambridge, MA (1996) 109–169Google Scholar
  11. Lovelace, K.L., Hegarty, M. and Montello, D.R.: Elements of good route directions in familiar and unfamiliar environments. In: Freksa, C. and Mark, D.M. (eds.): Spatial Information Theory: cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science. Lectures Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1661. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1999) 65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lynch, K.: The image of the city. MIT Press, Cambridge MA (1960)Google Scholar
  13. Milgram, S. and Jodelet, D.: Psychological maps of Paris. In: Proshansky, H.M., Ittelson, W.H. and Rivlin, L.G. (eds.): Environmental Psychology: people and their physical settings (2nd edition). Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York (1976) 104–124Google Scholar
  14. Montello, D.R.: Spatial orientation and the angularity of urban routes: a field study. Environment and Behavior 23 (1991), 47–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pederson, E.: Geographic and manipulable space in two Tamil linguistic systems. In Frank, A.U. and Campari, I. (eds.): Spatial Information Theory. Lectures Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 716. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1993) 294–311Google Scholar
  16. Pederson, E., Danziger, E., Levinson, S., Kita, S., Senft, G. and Wilkins, D.: Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language 74 (1998) 557–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rapoport, A.: Human aspects of urban form: towards a man-environment approach to urban form and design. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1977)Google Scholar
  18. Rossano, M.J. and Warren, D.H.: Misaligned maps lead to predictable errors. Perception 18 (1989) 215–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tversky, B.: Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology 13 (1981) 407–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Werner, S. and Schmidt, K.: Environmental reference systems for large-scale spaces. Spatial Cognition and Computation 1 (1999) 447–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wright, P., Lickorish, A., Hull, A. and Ummelen, N.: Graphics in written directions: appreciated by readers but not writers. Applied Cognitive Psychology 9 (1995) 41–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clare Davies
    • 1
  • Eric Pederson
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept of PsychologyUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK
  2. 2.Dept of LinguisticsUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations