Virtual Enterprise Design - BDI Agents vs. Objects

  • Iyad Rahwan
  • Ryszard Kowalczyk
  • Yun Yang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2112)

Abstract

Current research identifying architectures for a virtual enterprise has moved from information modelling to role modelling. Thus, a high level of autonomy results from the distribution of responsibilities, capabilities, and knowledge among different business units in the virtual enterprise at the design stage. Current trends tend towards using object-oriented technology as an effective abstract system design and implementation methodology. We argue that applying the software agent paradigm to the virtual enterprise provides various advantages on both the design and operational levels. We further show that the Belief Desire Intention agent architecture has additional abilities of mapping real world business unit autonomy and interaction. We also introduce the Belief Desire Intention agent paradigm capability of facilitating highly flexible (agile) enterprise design and implementation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. 1.
    The NIIIP Reference Architecture, 1996, http://www.//niiip.org.
  2. 2.
    Walton, J., Whicker, L.: Virtual Enterprise: Myth & Reality. J. Control (1996).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: Cooperative Systems Challenges in Virtual Enterprises. Proceedings of the 2nd IMACS International Multiconference on Computational Engineering in Systems Applications (in CD), CESA’98, Nabeul-Hammamet, Tunisia, April (1998).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Workflow Management Coalition: Workflow Management Coalition, The Workflow Reference Model-Document Number TC00-1003, Issue 1.1, Brussels, Nov (1994).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chrysanthis, P.K., Znati, T., Banerjee, S., Chang, S.K.: Establishing Virtual Enterprises by means of Mobile Agents. RIDE99, Sydney, Australia, (1999) 116–123.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmidt, M.T.: Building Workflow Business Objects. Proceedings of the OOPSLA 98. Workshop on Business Object Component Design and Implementation. Vancouver, (1998).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ovum Report. Intelligent agents: the new revolution in software (1994).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wooldridge, M.: Intelligent Agents. In: Grehard Weiss (ed.): Multiagent Systems. MIT Press (1999).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.: Applications of Intelligent Agents. In: Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge (eds.): Agent Technology: Foundations, Applications, and Markets (1998) 3–28.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rao, A., Georgeff, M.: BDI Agents: From Theory to Practice. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-95), San Fransisco, USA, June, (1995).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dignum, F., Morley, D., Sonenberg, E.A., Cavedon, L.: Towards socially sophisticated BDI agents. (To appear) In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems, Boston, USA (ICMAS 2000).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    d’Inverno, M., Kinny, D., Luck, M.: Interaction Protocols in Boa. Proceedings of ICMAS (1998).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farhoodi, F., Fingar, P.: Competing for the Future with Intelligent Agents. Distributed Object Computing, “DOC” Magazine, Part 1: Oct 1997, Part 2: Nov (1997).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wood, A., Milosevic, Z., Aagedal, J.O.: Describing Virtual Enterprises: the Object of Roles and the Role of Objects. Proceedings of the OOPSLA 98. Workshop on Objects, Components and the Virtual Enterprise. Vancouver (1998).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jennings, N.R., Norman, T.J., Faratin, P.: ADEPT: An Agent-Based Approach to Business Process Management. SIGMOND Record 27(4), (1998) 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burg, B.K.B.: Using Intentional Information to Coordinate Interoperating Workflows. Proceedings of the OOPSLA 98._Workshop on Business Object Component Design and Implementation. Vancouver, (1998).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dove, R., Hartman, S., Benson, S.: An Agile Enterprise Reference Model with a Case Study of Remmele Engineering. Agiligy Forum, December (1996), Report AR96-04.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dove, R.: Design Principles for Highly Adaptable Business Systems, With Tangible Manufacturing Examples. Maryland’s Industrial Handbook. McGraw Hill, (1999).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sandholm, T., Lesser, V.: Coalition Formation Among Bounded Rational Agents. 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95), Montreal, Canada, (1995) pp. 662–669.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iyad Rahwan
    • 1
  • Ryszard Kowalczyk
    • 2
  • Yun Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information TechnologySwinburne University of TechnologyHawthornAustralia
  2. 2.CSIRO Mathematical and Information SciencesCarltonAustralia

Personalised recommendations