Advertisement

Explicit Modeling of the Semantics of Large Multi-layered Object-Oriented Databases

  • Christoph Koch
  • Zsolt Kovacs
  • Jean-Marie Le Goff
  • Richard McClatchey
  • Paolo Petta
  • Tony Solomonides
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1920)

Abstract

Description-driven systems based on meta-objects are an increasingly popular way to handle complexity in large-scale object- oriented database applications. Such systems facilitate the management of large amounts of data and provide a means to avoid database schema evolution in many settings. Unfortunately, the description-driven approach leads to a loss of simplicity of the schema, and additional software behaviour is required for the management of dependencies, description relationships, and other Design Patterns that recur across the schema. This leads to redundant implementations of software that cannot be handled by using a framework-based approach. This paper presents an approach to address this problem which is based on the concept of an ontology of Design Patterns. Such an ontology allows the convenient separation of the structure and the semantics of database schemata. Through that, reusable software can be produced which separates application behaviour from the database schema.

Keywords

Design Pattern Software Component Compact Muon Solenoid Class Diagram Semantic Modeling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baumer, D. et al., “Framework Development for Large Systems”. Communications of the ACM 40(10), October 1997 pp. 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bazan, A. et al., “The Use of Production Management Techniques in the Construction of Large Scale Physics Detectors”. In Proceedings of the IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference, Toronto, Canada. November 1998.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blaha, M., and Premerlani, W., Object-Oriented Modeling and Design for Database Applications. Prentice Hall Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brachman, R.J., and Schmolze, J.G. “An Overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System”. Cognitive Science 9(2), 1985.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chakravarthy, U.S., Grant, J., and Minker, J. “Logic-based Approach to Semantic Query Optimization”. ACM TODS 15(2):162–207, June 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    CMS Collaboration, “CMS Technical Proposal”. January 1995. Available from ftp://cmsdoc.cern.ch/TPref/TP.html
  7. 7.
    Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., and Vlissides, J., Design Patterns-Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huhns, M., and Singh, M. 1997. “Ontologies for Agents”. In IEEE Internet Computing November-December 1997, pp. 81–83.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kovacs, Z., “The Integration of Product Data with Workflow Management Systems through a Common Data Model”. PhD thesis, Univ. of the West of England, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laddaga, R., and Veitch, J. (ed.), “Dynamic Object Technology”, Communications of the ACM 40(5):37–69, May 1997.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McClatchey, R. et al., “The Role of Meta-Objects and Self-Description in an Engineering Data Warehouse”. Proc. 3rd IEEE Int’l Database Engineering & Applications Symposium (IDEAS’99), pp. 342–350. Montreal, Canada. August 1999.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ODMG. The Object Database Standard: ODMG 2.0. Morgan Kaufmann, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoph Koch
    • 1
  • Zsolt Kovacs
    • 1
  • Jean-Marie Le Goff
    • 1
  • Richard McClatchey
    • 2
  • Paolo Petta
    • 3
  • Tony Solomonides
    • 2
  1. 1.EP DivisionCERNGeneva 23Switzerland
  2. 2.Centre for Complex Cooperative SystemsUniv. West of EnglandBristolUK
  3. 3.Austrian Research Institute for Artificial IntelligenceViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations