Validating a Hamilton-Jacobi Approximation to Hybrid System Reachable Sets
We develop a general framework for solving the hybrid system reachability problem, and indicate how several published techniques fit into this framework. The key unresolved need of any hybrid system reachability algorithm is the computation of continuous reachable sets; consequently, we present new results on techniques for calculating numerical approximations of such sets evolving under general nonlinear dynamics with inputs. Our tool is based on a local level set procedure for boundary propagation in continuous state space, and has been implemented using numerical schemes of varying orders of accuracy. We demonstrate the numerical convergence of these schemes to the viscosity solution of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, which was shown in earlier work to be the exact representation of the boundary of the reachable set. We then describe and solve a new benchmark example in nonlinear hybrid systems: an auto-lander for a commercial aircraft in which the switching logic and continuous control laws are designed to maximize the safe operating region across the hybrid state space.
KeywordsHybrid System Total Variation Diminish Reachability Problem Continuous State Space Linear Hybrid Automaton
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.C. Tomlin, J. Lygeros, and S. Sastry, “Controller design for hybrid systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 88, no. 7, July 2000.Google Scholar
- 3.C. J. Tomlin, Hybrid Control of Air Traffic Management Systems. PhD thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 1998.Google Scholar
- 4.O. Maler, A. Pnueli, and J. Sifakis, “On the synthesis of discrete controllers for timed systems,” in STACS 95: Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (E. W. Mayr and C. Puech, eds.), no. 900 in LNCS, pp. 229–242, Munich: Springer Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
- 5.E. Asarin, O. Maler, and A. Pnueli, “Symbolic controller synthesis for discrete and timed systems,” in Proceedings of Hybrid Systems II, Volume 999 of LNCS (P. Antsaklis, W. Kohn, A. Nerode, and S. Sastry, eds.), Cambridge: Springer Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
- 6.H. Wong-Toi, “The synthesis of controllers for linear hybrid automata,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, (San Diego, CA), 1997.Google Scholar
- 7.T. Dang, Vérification et synthèse des systèmes hybrides. PhD thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble (Verimag), 2000.Google Scholar
- 9.B. Silva and B. H. Krogh, “Formal verification of hybrid systems using CheckMate: A case study,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, (Chicago, IL), pp. 1679–1683, 2000.Google Scholar
- 14.A. Chutinan and B. H. Krogh, “Approximating quotient transition systems for hybrid systems,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, (Chicago, IL), pp. 1689–1693, 2000.Google Scholar
- 23.M. Kang, R. Fedkiw, and X.-D. Liu, “A boundary condition capturing method for multiphase incompressible flow,” Journal of Computational Physics, 2000. Submitted.Google Scholar
- 26.I. M. Kroo, Aircraft Design: Synthesis and Analysis. Stanford, California: Desktop Aeronautics Inc., 1999.Google Scholar
- 27.J. Anderson, Fundamentals of Aerodynamics. New York: McGraw Hill Inc., 1991.Google Scholar
- 28.United States Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Aviation Regulations, 1990. Section 25.125 (landing).Google Scholar