Advertisement

Minimum-Cost Reachability for Priced Time Automata

  • Gerd Behrmann
  • Ansgar Fehnker
  • Thomas Hune
  • Kim Larsen
  • Paul Pettersson
  • Judi Romijn
  • Frits Vaandrager
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2034)

Abstract

This paper introduces the model of linearly priced timed automata as an extension of timed automata, with prices on both transitions and locations. For this model we consider the minimum-cost reachability problem: i.e. given a linearly priced timed automaton and a target state, determine the minimum cost of executions from the initial state to the target state. This problem generalizes the minimum-time reachability problem for ordinary timed automata. We prove decidability of this problem by offering an algorithmic solution, which is based on a combination of branch-and-bound techniques and a new notion of priced regions. The latter allows symbolic representation and manipulation of reachable states together with the cost of reaching them.

Keywords

Timed Automata Verification Data Structures Algorithms Optimization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Parosh Aziz Abdulla and Aletta Nylén. Better is better than well: On efficient verification of infinite-state systems. In Proc. of the 14th IEEE Symp. on Logic in Computer Science. IEEE, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Alur, C. Courcoubetis, and T. A. Henzinger. Computing accumulated delays in real-time systems. In Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Computer Aided Verification, number 697 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 181–193, 1993.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Alur and D. Dill. Automata for Modelling Real-Time Systems. Theoretical Computer Science, 126(2):183–236, April 1994.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Asarin and O. Maler. As soon as possible: Time optimal control for timed automata. In Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, number 1569 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 19–30. Springer-Verlag, March 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gerd Behrmann, Ansgar Fehnker, Thomas Hune, Kim Larsen, Paul Pettersson, and Judi Romijn. Efficient guiding towards cost-optimality in uppaal. Accepted for TACAS 2001.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gerd Behrmann, Ansgar Fehnker, Thomas Hune, Kim Larsen, Paul Pettersson, Judi Romijn, and Frits Vaandrager. Minimum-cost reachability for priced timed automata. Technical Report RS-01-03, BRICS, January 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marius Bozga, Conrado Daws, Oded Maler, Alfredo Olivero, Stavros Tripakis, and Sergio Yovine. Kronos: A Model-Checking Tool for Real-Time Systems. In Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on Computer Aided Verification, number 1427 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 546–550. Springer-Verlag, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    David Dill. Timing Assumptions and Verification of Finite-State Concurrent Systems. In J. Sifakis, editor, Proc. of Automatic Verification Methods for Finite State Systems, number 407 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 197–212. Springer-Verlag, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ansgar Fehnker. Scheduling a steel plant with timed automata. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications (RTCSA99), pages 280–286. IEEE Computer Society, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. A. Henzinger. The theory of hybrid automata. In Proc. of 11th Annual Symp. on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 96), pages 278–292. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thomas A. Henzinger, Pei-Hsin Ho, and Howard Wong-Toi. HyTech: A Model Checker for Hybird Systems. In Orna Grumberg, editor, Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Computer Aided Verification, number 1254 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 460–463. Springer-Verlag, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Higman. Ordering by divisibility in abstract algebras. Proc. of the London Math. Soc., 2:326–336, 1952.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thomas Hune, Kim G. Larsen, and Paul Pettersson. Guided Synthesis of Control Programs Using Uppaal. In Ten H. Lai, editor, Proc. of the IEEE ICDCS International Workshop on Distributed Systems Verification and Validation, pages E15–E22. IEEE Computer Society Press, April 2000.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim G. Larsen, Paul Pettersson, and Wang Yi. Uppaal in a Nutshell. Int. Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 1(1-2):134–152, October 1997.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim G. Larsen, Carsten Weise, Wang Yi, and Justin Pearson. Clock difference diagrams. Nordic Journal of Computing, 6(3):271–298, 1999.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Møller, J. Lichtenberg, H. R. Andersen, and H. Hulgaard. Difference decision diagrams. Technical Report IT-TR-1999-023, Department of Information Technology, Technical University of Denmark, February 1999.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peter Niebert, Stavros Tripakis, and Sergio Yovine. Minimum-time reachability for timed automata. In IEEE Mediteranean Control Conference, 2000.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peter Niebert and Sergio Yovine. Computing optimal operation schemes for multi batch operation of chemical plants. VHS deliverable, May 1999. Draft.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerd Behrmann
    • 1
  • Ansgar Fehnker
    • 3
  • Thomas Hune
    • 2
  • Kim Larsen
    • 1
  • Paul Pettersson
    • 4
  • Judi Romijn
    • 3
  • Frits Vaandrager
    • 3
  1. 1.Basic Research in Computer ScienceAalborg UniversityThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Basic Research in Computer ScienceAarhus UniversityThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Computing Science InstituteUniversity of NijmegenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Computer SystemsInformation Technology Uppsala UniversityThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations