A Multi-view Method for Gait Recognition Using Static Body Parameters
A multi-view gait recognition method using recovered static body parameters of subjects is presented; we refer to these parameters as activity-specific biometrics. Our data consists of 18 subjects walking at both an angled and frontal-parallel view with respect to the camera. When only considering data from a single view, subjects are easily discriminated; however, discrimination decreases when data across views are considered. To compare between views, we use ground truth motioncapture data of a reference subject to find scale factors that can transform data from different viewsi nto a common frame (“walking-space”). Instead of reporting percent correct from a limited database, we report our results using an expected confusion metric that allows us to predict how our static body parameters filter identity in a large population: lower confusion yields higher expected discrimination power. We show that using motion-capture data to adjust vision data of different views to a common reference frame, we can get achieve expected confusions rates on the order of 6%.
KeywordsMutual Information Vision Data View Angle Gait Recognition Reference Subject
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bobick, A.F. and A.Y. Johnson, “Expected Confusion as a Method of Evaluating Recognition Techniques,” Technical Report GIT.GVU-01-01, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2001. http://www.gvu.gatech.edu/reports/2001/.
- 3.Cunado, D., M.S. Nixion, and J.N. Carter, “Automatic Gait Recognition via Model-Based Evidence Gathering,” accepted for IEEE AutoID99, Summit NJ, 1999.Google Scholar
- 4.Cutting, J. and L. Kozlowski, “Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues,” Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 9 pp. 353–356, 1977.Google Scholar
- 5.Davis, J.W. and A.F. Bobick, “The representation and recognition of action using temporal templates,” Proc. IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Juan, Puerto Rico, pp 928–934, 1997.Google Scholar
- 6.Haritaoglu, I., D. Harwood, and L. Davis, “W4: Who, When, Where, What: A real time system for detecting and tracking people,” Proc. of Third Face and Gesture Recognition Conference, pp. 222–227, April 1998.Google Scholar
- 8.Kozlowski, L. and J. Cutting, “Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display,” Perception and Psychophysics, 21 pp. 575–580, 1977.Google Scholar
- 9.Little, J.J. and J.E. Boyd, “Recognizing people by their gait: the shape of motion,” Videre, 1, 1996.Google Scholar
- 11.Niyogi, S. and E. Adelson, “Analyzing and Recognizing Walking Figures in XYT,” Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 469–474, Seattle, 1994.Google Scholar