Azzam, S., K. Humphreys, R. Gaizauskas: Evaluating a Focus-Based Approach to Anaphora Resolution. Proc. of COLING-ACL’98, 1998, pp. 74–78.
Bolshakov, I.A., A.F. Gelbukh: A Very Large Database of Collocations and Semantic Links. NLDB’2000: 5th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, Versailles, France, June 28–30, 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer.Google Scholar
Carberry, S., Lambert, L.: A process model for recognizing communicative acts and modeling negotiation subdialogues. Comp. Ling., 25
(1), 1999: 1–54.Google Scholar
Carter, D.: Interpreting anaphora in natural language texts. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1987.Google Scholar
Cassidy, P.: An Investigation of the Semantic Relations in the Roget’s Thesaurus: Preliminary results, http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/ai-epository/ai/new/FSN_DOC.ASC
Chierchia, G.: Dynamics of Meaning: Anaphora, Presupposition, and the Theory of Grammar. University of Chicago Press, 1995.
Cornish, F.: Anaphora, Discourse, and Understanding: Evidence from English and French. Oxford University Press, 1999.
Erku, F., J. K. Gundel: The pragmatics of indirect anaphors. In J. Verschueren and M. Bertuccelli-Papi (Eds.), The pragmatic perspective: Selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1987. pp. 533–545.Google Scholar
Ferrandez, A., M. Palomar, L. Moreno: Anaphor resolution in unrestricted text with partial parsing. Coling-98, 1998, pp. 385–391.
Gelbukh, A., Sidorov, G.: On Indirect Anaphora Resolution. Proc. PACLING-99, Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, August 25–28, 1999, pp. 181–190.Google Scholar
Gelbukh, A., G. Sidorov, A. Guzman-Arenas: Use of a Weighted Topic Hierarchy for Document Classification. In: Text, Speech and Dialogue, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1692, Springer, 1999.
Gundel, J., N. Hedberg, R. Zacharski: Givenness, Implicature and Demonstrative Expressions in English Discourse. Proc. of 25th meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society, Part II (Parasession on Language in Context). Chicago, 1988. pp. 89–103.
Fretheim, T, J. K. Gundel (eds.): Reference and referent accessibility. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1996.Google Scholar
Hahn, U., M. Strube, K. Markert. Bridging textual ellipses. Proc. of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1996. pp. 496–501.
Hirst, G., D. St-Onge: Lexical chains as representations of context for the detection and correction of malapropisms. In: Christiane Fellbaum (editor), WordNet: An electronic lexical database and some of its applications, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Indirect Anaphora Workshop. Lancaster University, Lancaster, 1996.
Kameyama, M.: Recognizing Referential Links: an Information Extraction Perspective. Proc. of ACL’ 97/EACL’ 97 workshop on Operational factors in practical, robust anaphora resolution. Madrid, 1997.
Kennedy, C., B. Boguraev. Anaphora for Everyone: Pronominal Anaphor Resolution without a Parser. Coling-96, 1996.
Mitkov, R.: Pronoun Resolution: the Practical Alternative. In: S. Botley and T. McEmery (eds), Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution, Univ. College London Press, 1997.
Mitkov, R.: Factors in Anaphora Resolution: They are not the Only Things that Matter. A Case Study Based on Two Different Approaches. Proc. of the ACL’97/EACL’97 workshop on Operational factors in practical, robust anaphora resolution. Madrid, 1997.
Mitkov, R.: An Integrated Model for Anaphora Resolution. Coling-94, 1994, pp. 1170–1176.
Morris, J., Hirst, G.: Lexical cohesion, the thesaurus, and the structure of text. Computational linguistics, 17(1), March 1991, 21–48.Google Scholar
Murata, M., H. Isahara, M. Nagao: Resolution of Indirect Anaphora in Japanese Sentences Using Examples “X no Y (Y of X).” ACL’99 Workshop on Coreference and Its Applications, Maryland, USA, June 22, 1999.
Partee, B., P. Sgall (Eds.): Discourse and Meaning. Papers in Honour of Eva Hajičova. Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 1996.Google Scholar
Sanford, A. J., S. C. Garrod, A. Lucas, R. Henderson: Pronouns without explicit antecedents? Journal of Semantics, 1983, 2: 303–318.Google Scholar
Sidorov, G., A. Gelbukh: Demonstrative pronouns as markers of indirect anaphora. Proc. 2nd International Conference on Cognitive Science and 16th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society Joint Conference (ICCS/JCSS99), July 27–30, 1999, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 418–423.
Sidorov, G., A. Gelbukh: A method of detection and resolution of hidden anaphora (in Russian, abstract in English). Proc. Annual International Conf. on Applied Linguistics Dialogue-99, May 30–June 5, 1999, Moscow, Russia. pp. 288–297.
Ward, G., B. Birner: Definiteness and the English existential. Language, 1994, 71
: 722–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coling-ACL’98 Workshop “Usage of WordNet in Natural Language Processing Systems.” August 16, 1998, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.