Polygon Decomposition for Efficient Construction of Minkowski Sums
Several algorithms for computing the Minkowski sum of two polygons in the plane begin by decomposing each polygon into convex subpolygons. We examine different methods for decomposing polygons by their suitability for efficient construction of Minkowski sums. We study and experiment with various well-known decompositions as well as with several new decomposition schemes. We report on our experiments with the various decompositions and different input polygons. Among our findings are that in general: (i) triangulations are too costly (ii) what constitutes a good decomposition for one of the input polygons depends on the other input polygon—consequently, we develop a procedure for simultaneously decomposing the two polygons such that a “mixed” objective function is minimized, (iii) there are optimal decomposition algorithms that significantly expedite the Minkowski-sum computation, but the decomposition itself is expensive to compute — in such cases simple heuristics that approximate the optimal decomposition perform very well.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.The CGAL User Manual, Version 2.0, 1999. http://www.cs.ruu.nl/CGAL.
- 2.P. K. Agarwal and M. Sharir. Arrangements. In J.-R. Sack and J. Urrutia, editors, Handbook of Computational Geometry, pages 49–119. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1999.Google Scholar
- 3.M. Bern. Triangulations. In J. E. Goodman and J. O’Rourke, editors, Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, chapter 22, pages 413–428. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, 1997.Google Scholar
- 4.B. Chazelle and D. P. Dobkin. Optimal convex decompositions. In G. T. Toussaint, editor, Computational Geometry, pages 63–133. North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1985.Google Scholar
- 6.G. Elber and M.-S. Kim, editors. Special Issue of Computer Aided Design: Offsets, Sweeps and Minkowski Sums, volume 31. 1999.Google Scholar
- 7.A. Fabri, G. Giezeman, L. Kettner, S. Schirra, and S. Schönherr. On the design of CGAL, the Computational Geometry Algorithms Library. Technical Report MPI-I-98-1-007, MPI Inform., 1998. To appear in Software—Practice and Experience Google Scholar
- 8.E. Flato. Robust and efficient construction of planar Minkowski sums. Master’s thesis, Dept. Comput. Sci., Tel-Aviv Univ., 2000. Forthcoming. http://www.math.tau.ac.il/ flato/thesis.ps.gz.
- 9.E. Flato, D. Halperin, I. Hanniel, and O. Nechushtan. The design and implementation of planar maps in CGAL. In J. Vitter and C. Zaroliagis, editors, Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Algorithm Engineering, volume 1148 of Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., pages 154–168. Springer-Verlag, 1999. Full version: http://www.math.tau.ac.il/ flato/WaeHtml/index.htm.
- 10.D. Halperin. Arrangements. In J. E. Goodman and J. O’Rourke, editors, Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, chapter 21, pages 389–412. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, 1997.Google Scholar
- 12.S. Har-Peled, T. M. Chan, B. Aronov, D. Halperin, and J. Snoeyink. The complexity of a single face of a Minkowski sum. In Proc. 7th Canad. Conf. Comput. Geom., pages 91–96, 1995.Google Scholar
- 13.G. Kant and H. L. Bodlaender. Triangulating planar graphs while minimizing the maximum degree. In Proc. 3rd Scand. Workshop Algorithm Theory, volume 621 of Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., pages 258–271. Springer-Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar
- 14.A. Kaul, M. A. O’Connor, and V. Srinivasan. Computing Minkowski sums of regular polygons. In Proc. 3rd Canad. Conf. Comput. Geom., pages 74–77, Aug. 1991.Google Scholar
- 17.J. M. Keil and J. Snoeyink. On the time bound for convex decomposition of simple polygons. In Proc. 10th Canad. Conf. Comput. Geom., 1998.Google Scholar
- 18.M. Keil. Polygon decomposition. In J.-R. Sack and J. Urrutia, editors, Handbook of Computational Geometry. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1999.Google Scholar
- 19.J.-C. Latombe. Robot Motion Planning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1991.Google Scholar
- 21.K. Melhorn and S. Näher. The LEDA Platform of Combinatorial and Geometric Computing. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- 22.K. Mulmuley. Computational Geometry: An Introduction Through Randomized Algorithms. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.Google Scholar
- 24.L. Santaló. Integral Probability and Geometric Probability, volume 1 of Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Addison-Wesley, 1979.Google Scholar
- 25.M. Sharir and P. K. Agarwal. Davenport-Schinzel Sequences and Their Geometric Applications Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar