Modelling and Removing Radial and Tangential Distortions in Spherical Lenses

  • Seven S. Beauchemin
  • Ruzena Bajcsy
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2032)


Spherical cameras are variable-resolution imaging systems and promising devices for autonomous navigation purposes, mainly be cause of their wide viewing angle which increases the capabilities of vision-based obstacle avoidance schemes. In addition, spherical lenses resemble the primate eye in their projective models and are biologically relevant. However, the calibration of spherical lenses for Computer Vi sion is a recent research topic and current procedures for pinhole camera calibration are inadequate when applied to spherical lenses. We present a novel method for spherical-lens camera calibration which models the lens radial and tangential distortions and determines the optical center and the angular deviations of the CCD sensor array within a unified numerical procedure. Contrary to other methods, there is no need for special equipment such as low-power laser beams or non-standard nu merical procedures for finding the optical center. Numerical experiments, convergence and robustness analyses are presented.


Calibration Point Optical Center Pinhole Camera Spherical Lens Radial Distortion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    R. L. Anderson, N. Alvertos, and E. L. Hall. Omnidirectional real time imaging using digital restoration, SPIE High Speed Photograph, 348, 1982.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Baker and S. K. Nayar. A theory of catadioptric image formation. In Proceedings of ICCV, pages 35–42, Bombay, India, January 1998.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Basu and S. Licardie. Alternative models for sh-eye lenses. Pattern Recognition Letters, 16(4):433–441, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Y. Kuniyoshi, N. Kita, and K. Sugimoto. A foveated wide angle lens for active vision. In IEEE Proceedings Robotics and Automation, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    K. Myiamoto. Fish eye lens. J. Lett., pages 1060–1061, 1964.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Y. Nomura, M. Sagara, H. Naruse, and A. Ide. Simple calibration algorithm for highdistortion lens camera. IEEE PAMI, 14(11):1095–1099, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    American Society of Photogrammetry. Manual of Photogrammetry, 4th edition. 1980.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    E. Polak. Computational Methods in Optimization. Academic Press, New-York, 1971.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. Shah and J. K. Aggarwal. Autonomous mobile robot navigation using fish-eye lenses. Image Analysis Applications and Computer Graphics, 1024:9–16, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    S. Shah and J. K. Aggarwal. Intrinsic parameter calibration procedure for a (high distortion)fish-eye lens camera with distortion model and accuracy estimation. Pattern Recognition, 29(11):1775–1778, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Shah and J. K. Aggarwal. Mobile robot navigation and scene modeling using stereo fish-eye lens system. Machine Vision and Applications, 10(4):159–173, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    S. W. Shih, Y. P. Hung, and W. S. Lin. When should we consider lens distortion in camera calibration. Pattern Recognition, 28(3):447–461, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    R. Y. Tsai. A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3d machine vision metrology using off-the-shelftv cameras and lenses. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 3(4):323–344, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. Weng, P. Cohen, and M. Herniou. Camera calibration with distortion models and accuracy evaluation. IEEE PAMI, 14(10):965–980, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seven S. Beauchemin
    • 1
  • Ruzena Bajcsy
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  2. 2.GRASP LaboratoryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations