Stereotypes, Student Models and Scrutability

  • Judy Kay
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1839)


Stereotypes are widely used in both Intelligent Teaching Systems and in a range of other teaching and advisory software. Yet the notion of stereotype is very loose. This paper gives a working definition of stereotypes for student modelling. The paper shows the role of stereotypes in classic approaches to student modelling via overlay, differential and buggy models.

A scrutable student model enables learners to scrutinise their models to determine what the system believes about them and how it determined those beliefs. The paper explores the ways that scrutable stereotypes can provide a foundation for learners to tune their student models and explore the impact of the student model. Linking this to existing work, the paper notes how scrutable stereotypes might support reflection and metacognition as well as efficient, learner-controlled student modelling.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Boyle, C.: User modeling in the interactive anatomy tutoring system ANATOM-TUTOR. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 4:1 (1994) 21–45CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyle, C., Encarnacion, A.O.: Metadoc: An adaptive hypertext reading system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 4:1 (1994) 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bull, S., Brna, P., Pain, H.: Extending the scope of the student model. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 5:1 (1995) 44–65Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burton, R.R.: Diagnosing bugs in a simple procedural skill. In: Sleeman, D., Brown, J.S. Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Academic Press, London (1982) 157–184Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan, T.W.: Learning companion systems, social learning systems, and the global social learning club. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 7 (1996) 125–159Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P., Glaser, R.: Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices. Cognitive Science. 5:2 (1981) *** pagesGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chin, D.N.: User Modelling in UC, the UNIX Consultant Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. In: Mantei, M. (ed.): ACM Press (1986) 24–28Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chin, D.N.: KNOME: modeling what the user knows in UC. In: Kobsa, A., Wahlster, W. (eds.): User models in dialog systems. (1989) 74–107.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.: Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 4 (1995) 253–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crawford, K., Kay, J.: Metacognitive processes and learning with intelligent educational systems. In: Slezak, P., Caelli, T., Clark, R., Perspectives on Cognitive Science, Ablex (1993) 63–77Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dimitrova M., Self J.: The interactive maintenance of open learner models. In: Lajoie, S., Vivet, M. (eds.): Artificial Intelligence in Education. (1999) 405–412Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fischer, G., Ackerman, D.: The importance of models in making complex systems comprehensible. In: Tauber, M. (ed.): Mental models and Human-computer Interaction 2. Elsevier (1991) 22–33Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goodman, B., Soller, A., Linton, F., Gaimari, R.: Encouraging student reflection and articulation using a learning companion. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 9 (1998) 237–255Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hietala, P., Niemirepo, T.: The Competence of Learning Companion Agents. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 9 (1998) 178–192.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Höök, K., Karlgren, J., Waern, A., Dahlbeck, N., Jansson, C.G., Lemaire, B.: A glass box approach to adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 6:2–3 Kluwer (1996) 157–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Horvitz, E., Breese, J., Heckerman, D., Hovel, D., Rommelse, K.,: The Lumiere Project: Bayesian User Modeling for Inferring the Goals and Needs of Software Users. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998) 256–265Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang, X., McCalla, G., Greer, J., Neufeld, E.: Revising deductive knowledge and stereotypical knowledge in a student model. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. Kluwer, 1:1 (1991) 87–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kay, J., Thomas, R.C.: Studying long term system use. Communications of the ACM. 38:2 (1995) 131–154Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kay, J.: The um toolkit for cooperative user modelling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 4:3 Kluwer (1995) 149–196CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson, W.L.: Understanding and debugging novice programs. Artificial Intelligence. 42:1 (1990) 51–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kono, Y. Ikeda, M. Mizoguchi, R.: To contradict is human: student modelling of inconsistency. In: Frasson, C., Gauthier, G., McCalla, G. (eds.): Intelligent tutoring systems. Springer-Verlag (1992) 451–458Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Morales, R.: Proceedings of the Workshop on Open, Interactive, and other Overt Approaches to Learner Modelling. 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. (1999)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Murphy, M., McTear, M.: Learner modelling for intelligent CALL. In: A. Jameson, A., Paris, C., Tasso, C. (Eds.), User modeling: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference, UM97. Springer Wien Vienna, New York (1997) 301–312Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oard, D.W.: The state of the art in text filtering. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 7:3 (1997) 141–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Paiva, A., Self, J., Hartley, R.: Externalising learner models. Proceedings of World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. AACE, Washington (1995) 509–516Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rich, E.: User modeling via stereotypes. Cognitive Science. 3 (1979) 355–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rich, E.: Users are individuals: individualizing user models. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 18 (1983) 199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rich, E.: Stereotypes and user modeling. In: Kobsa, A., Wahlster, W.: User models in dialog systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1989) 35–51Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Self, J.: In: Lawler, R.W., Yazdani, M.: Artificial Intelligence and Education. 1 (1987) 267–280Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Self, J.: Bypassing the Intractable Problem of Student Modelling: Invited paper. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Montreal (1988) 18–24Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Self, J.: The defining characteristics of intelligent tutoring systems research: ITSs care, precisely. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. (2000) to appear.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Winter, M., McCalla, G.: The emergence of student models from an analysis of ethical decision making in scenario-based learning environment. In: Kay, J. (ed.): User Modeling: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference, UM99. Springer Wien, New York (1999) 265–274Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Woolf, B., Murray, T.: A framework for representing tutorial discourse. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1987)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judy Kay
    • 1
  1. 1.Basser Dept of Computer Science Madsen F09University of SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations