Validation of the Interval Deformation Technique for Compensating Soft Tissue Artefact in Human Motion Analysis

  • Rita Stagni
  • 2 Silvia Fantozzi
  • Angelo Cappello
  • Alberto Leardini
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2673)

Abstract

Soft tissue artefact is the most invalidating source of error in human motion analysis. This error is caused by the erroneous assumption that markers on the skin surface are rigidly connected to the underlying bone. Several methods have been proposed in the literature to compensate for this spurious effect by mathematical modelling of the interposed soft tissues. Validation of these methods has been performed only on simulated data or on a small sample of data acquired from subjects mounting devices which limit skin motion. In the present study, the performance of one of the most recent compensation methods was evaluated using experimental data acquired combining stereophotogrammetry and 3D video-fluoroscopy. The effectiveness of the compensation method was found strongly dependent on the modelling form assumed for the motion of the markers in the bone frame. Even when the compensation produced a significant advantage in the evaluation of bone orientation, the estimation of position was critical.

Keywords

Singular Value Decomposition Orientation Error Skin Marker Global Reference Frame Human Motion Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cappozzo, A., Catani, F., Leardini, A., Benedetti, M.G., Croce, U.D.: Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. Clinical Biomechanics 11 (1996) 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andriacchi, T.P., Alexander, E.J.: Studies of human locomotion: past, present and future. Journal of Biomechanics 33 (2000) 1217–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cappello, A., Cappozzo, A., La Palombara, P.F., Lucchetti, L., Leardini, A.: Multiple anatomical landmark calibration for optimal bone pose estimation. Human Movement Science 16 (1997) 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lu, T.W., O’Connor, J.J.: Bone position estimation from skin markers co-ordinates using global optimisation with joint constraints. Journal of Biomechanics 32 (1999) 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lucchetti, L., Cappozzo, A., Cappello, A., Della Croce, U.: Skin movement artefact assessment and compensation in the estimation on knee-joint kinematics. Journal of Biomechanics 31 (1998) 977–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andriacchi, T.P., Alexander, E.J., Toney, M.K., Dyrby, C.O., Sum, J.: A point cluster method for in vivo motion analysis: applied to a study of knee kinematics. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 120 (1998) 743–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alexander, E.J., Andriacchi, T.P.: Correcting for deformation in skin-based marker systems. Journal of Biomechanics 34 (2001) 355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Benedetti, M.G., Catani, F., Leardini, A., Pignotti, E., and Giannini, S.: Data management in gait analysis for clinical applications. Clinical Biomechanics 13 (1998) 204–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gronenschild, E.: The accuracy and reproducibility of a global method to correct for geometric image distortion in the x-ray imaging chain. Medical Physics 24 (1997), 1875–1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Banks, S.A., Hodge, W.A.: Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 43 (1996) 638–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cappozzo, A., Catani, F., Croce, U.D., Leardini, A.: Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clinical Biomechanics 10 (1995) 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soderkvist, I., Wedin, P.A.: Determining the movements of the skeleton using wellconfigured markers. Journal of Biomechanics 26 (1993) 1473–1477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fantozzi, S., Stagni, R., Cappello, A., Leardini, A., Catani, F.: Assessment of skin motion artefact from a combined fluoroscopic and stereophotogrammetric analysis. In Proceedings SIAMOC 2002, 13–15 October 2002, Bologna (Italy). Gait & Posture, 16 (2002) S192–S193.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stagni, R., Fantozzi, S., Cappello, A., Ussia, L., Leardini, A.: Propagation of skin motion artefacts to knee joint kinematics. In Proceedings SIAMOC 2002, 13–15 October 2002, Bologna (Italy). Gait & Posture, 16 (2002) S211–S212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stagni, R., Fantozzi, S., Cappello, A., Leardini, A.: Quantification of soft tissue artefact in motion analysis by compining 3D fluoroscopy and stereophotogrammetry. Submitted to the Journal of Biomechanics (2002).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rita Stagni
    • 1
    • 2
  • 2 Silvia Fantozzi
    • 1
  • Angelo Cappello
    • 1
  • Alberto Leardini
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electronics, Computer Science and SystemsUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Movement Analysis LaboratoryIstituti Ortopedici RizzoliBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations