Managing Experience for Process Improvement in Manufacturing

  • Radhika B. Selvamani
  • Deepak Khemani
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2689)

Abstract

Process changes in manufacturing are often done by trial and error, even when experienced domain personnel are involved. This is mainly due to the fact that in many domains the number of parameters involved is large and there exists only a partial understanding of interrelationships between them. This paper describes a framework for keeping track of process change experiments, before they qualify as full cases. Process changes happen as a result of diagnosis done by the expert, following which some therapy is decided. The paper also presents an algorithm for diagnosis and therapy based on induction on discrimination trees constructed on specific views on the set of problem parameters.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Watson, I.: Applying Case-Based Reasoning: Techniques for Enterprise Systems. Morgan Kauffman Publishers, Inc. San Francisco, CA, (1997) 61–77MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mitchell, Tom M.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Singapore (1997)MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pazzani, Michael J.: Knowledge discovery from data ?, IEEE Intelligent Systems and their applications, Special issue on Data Mining II, Vol. 15, No. 2, March/April 2000, pp. 10–13Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khemani, D., Selvamani, Radhika B., Dhar, Anando R., Michael, S.M.: InfoFrax: CBR in Fused Cast Refractory Manufacture. in S. Craw, A. Preece (Eds.): Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, 6th European Conference, ECCBR 2002, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK,. Proceedings, LNAI 2416, (2002) 560–574Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Althoff, K.-D., Decker, B., Hartkopf, S., Jedlitschka, A., Nick, M., Rech, J.: Experience Management: The Fraunhofer IESE Experience Factory, P. Perner) (eds).: In Proc. Industrial Conference Data Mining. July (2001) Leipzig 24.–25Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Birk, A., Surmann, D., Althoff, K.-D.: Applications of Knowledge Acquisition in Experimental Software Engineering. Fensel, D., Studer, R.: (Eds.): Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling, and Management (EKAW’99), Springer Verlag, (1999) 67–84.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fisher, G., Ostwald J.: Knowledge Management: Problems, Promises, Realities, and Challenges. In: Special issue on Knowledge Management. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol. 16, no. 1, Jan./Feb. (2001) 60–72Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bergmann, R., Breen, S., Göker, M., Manago, M., Schumacher, J., Stahl, A., Tartarin, E., Wess, S., Wilke, W.: The INRECA-II Methodology for Building and Maintaining CBR Applications. (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Althoff, K.-D., Becker-Kornstaedt, U., Decker, B., Klotz, A., Leopold, E., Rech, J., Voss, A.: The indiGo Project: Enhancement of Experience Management and Process Learning with Moderated Discourses. In P. Perner (Ed.): Data Mining in E-Commerce, Medicine and Knowledge Management, Springer Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. (2002).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Althoff, K.-D., Bomarius, F., Müller, W. & Nick, M.: Using a Case-Based Reasoning for Supporting Continuous Improvement Processes. In: P. Perner (ed.): Proc. German Workshop on Machine Learning, Technical Report. Institute for Image Processing and Applied Informatics, Leipzig, (1999).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Price, C., Pegler, I S., Ratcliffe, M B., McManus, A.: From troubleshooting to process design: closing the manufacturing loop. In proc. 2nd International Conference, ICCBR-97, Providence, Rhode Island, USA, July 25-27, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1266 Springer (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Michael, S. M., Khemani, D.: Knowledge Management in Manufacturing Technology, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Enterprise Information System 2002, Ciudad Real,, Spain, Vol. I. (2002) 506–512Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schank, Roger C.: Dynamic Memory Revisited. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London, NewYork (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kolodner, J.: Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers,Inc., SanMateo, California (1993).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Patterson, D., Anand, S S., Dubitzky, W., Hughes, J G.: Towards Automated Case Knowledge Discovery in the M2 Case-Based Reasoning System. In Knowledge and Information Systems: An International Journal. Springer Verlag, Vol. 1 (1999) 61–82.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Selvamani, Radhika B., Khemani D.: Investigating Cause for Failures in Discrimination Tree from Multiple Views. In the proceedings of the International Conference of Knowledge Based Computer Systems, Mumbai (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quinlan, J.R., C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers,Inc., SanMateo, California (1993)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Han,. J., Nishio, S., Kawano, H., Wang, W.: Generalization based data mining in object oriented database using an object cube model. Data and Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 25 (1998) 55–97MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Radhika B. Selvamani
    • 1
  • Deepak Khemani
    • 1
  1. 1.A.I. & D.B. Lab, Dept. of Computer Science & EngineeringI.I.T.MadrasIndia

Personalised recommendations