Abstract
Research on human spatial memory and navigational ability has recently shown the strong influence of reference systems in spatial memory on the ways spatial information is accessed in navigation and other spatially oriented tasks. One of the main findings can be characterized as a large cognitive cost, both in terms of speed and accuracy that occurs whenever the reference system used to encode spatial information in memory is not aligned with the reference system required by a particular task. In this paper, the role of aligned and misaligned reference systems is discussed in the context of the built environment and modern architecture. The role of architectural design on the perception and mental representation of space by humans is investigated. The navigability and usability of built space is systematically analysed in the light of cognitive theories of spatial and navigational abilities of humans. It is concluded that a building’s navigability and related wayfinding issues can benefit from architectural design that takes into account basic results of spatial cognition research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, G.L. (1999). Spatial abilities, cognitive maps, and wayfinding: Bases for individual differences in spatial cognition and behavior. In R. Golledge (ed.), Wayfinding behavior (pp. 46–80). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
Arthur, P. & Passini, R. (1992). Wayfinding: People, Signes, & Architecture New York: McGraw-Hill.
Carlson, L. A. (1999). Selecting a reference frame. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 365–379.
Cheng, K. & Gallistel, R. (1984). Testing the geometric power of an animal’s spatial representation. In H.L. Roitblat, T.G. Bever, & H.S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 409–423). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Gallistel, R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Gillner, S. & Mallot, H.A. (1998) Navigation and acquisition of spatial knowledge in a virtual maze. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 445–463.
Golledge, R.G. (1999). Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. In R. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding behavior (pp. 5–45). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
Gouteux, S., Thinus-Blanc, C., & Vauclair, J. (2001). Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 505–519.
Hermer, L. & Spelke, E. (1994). A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature, 370, 57–59.
Hermer, L. & Spelke, E. (1996). Modularity and development: The case of spatial reorientation. Cognition, 61, 195–232.
Le Corbusier. (1931 / 1986). Towards a new architecture. New York: Dover
Levine, M., Jankovic, I. N., & Palij, M. (1982). Principles of spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 111, 157–175.
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT-Press.
McNamara, T.P., Rump, B., & Werner, S. (in press). Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Montello, D. R. (1991). Spatial orientation and the angularity of urban routes: A field study. Environment and Behavior, 23, 47–69.
O’Neill, M.J. (1991). Effects of signage and floor plan configuration on wayfinding accuracy. Environment and Behavior, 23, 553–574.
Passini, R. (1984). Wayfinding in Architecture New York: Van Nostrand.
Pederson, E. (1993). Geographic and manipulable space in two Tamil linguistic systems. In A.U. Frank & I. Camari (Eds.), Spatial information theory (pp. 294–311). Berlin: Springer.
Poucet, B. (1993). Spatial cognitive maps in animals: New hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. Psychological Review, 100, 163–182.
Presson, C.C. & Hazelrigg, M.D. (1984). Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 723–732.
Rock, I. (1979). Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
Schölkopf, B. and Mallot, H. A. (1995). View-based cognitive mapping and planning. Adaptive Behavior 3, 311–348.
Shelton, A.L. & McNamara, T.P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102–104.
Shelton, A.L. & McNamara, T.P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 274–310..
Sholl, M.J. & Nolin, T.L. (1999). Orientation specificity in representations of place. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
Sholl, M.J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 615–628.
Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 55–82.
Wehner, R., Michel, B., & Antonsen, P. (1996). Visual navigation in insects: Coupling of egocentric and geocentric information. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 199, 129–140.
Weisman, J. (1981). Evaluating architectural legibility: way-finding in the built environment. Environment and Behavior, 13, 189–204.
Werner, S. (2001). Role of environmental reference systems in human spatial memory. Poster presented at the 42 nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, 15–18 November, 2001
Werner, S. & Jaeger, M. (2002.). Intrinsic reference systems in map displays. To appear in: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting, Baltimore.
Werner, S., Krieg-Brückner, B., & Herrmann, T. (2000). Modelling spatial knowledge by route graphs. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K.F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition II-Integrating Abstract Theories, Empirical Studies, Formal Methods, and Practical Applications, LNAI 1849 (pp. 295–316). Berlin: Springer.
Werner, S. & Schmidt, K. (1999). Environmental reference systems for large-scale spaces. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 447–473.
Werner, S. & Schmidt, T. (2000). Investigating spatial reference systems through distortions in visual memory. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K.F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition II-Integrating Abstract Theories, Empirical Studies, Formal Methods, and Practical Applications, LNAI 1849 (pp. 169–183). Berlin: Springer.
Werner, S. Schmidt, T., & Jainek, V. (in prep.). The role of environmental slant in human spatial memory.
Werner, S., Saade, C. & Lüer, G. (1998). Relations between the mental representation of extrapersonal space and spatial behavior. In K.-F. Wender, C. Freksa & C. Habel (Eds.), Spatial Cognition-An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge, LNAI 1404 (pp. 108–127). Berlin: Springer.
Wiltschko, R. & Wiltschko, W. (1999). Compass orientation as a basic element in avian orientation and navigation. In R. Golledge (ed.), Wayfinding behavior (pp. 259–293). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Werner, S., Long, P. (2003). Cognition Meets Le Corbusier — Cognitive Principles of Architectural Design. In: Freksa, C., Brauer, W., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds) Spatial Cognition III. Spatial Cognition 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2685. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45004-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45004-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40430-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45004-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive