Engineered communications for microbial robotics
Multicellular organisms create complex patterned structures from identical, unreliable components. Learning how to engineer such robust behavior is important to both an improved understanding of computer science and to a better understanding of the natural developmental process. Earlier work by our colleagues and ourselves on amorphous computing demonstrates in simulation how one might build complex patterned behavior in this way. This work reports on our first efforts to engineer microbial cells to exhibit this kind of multicellular pattern directed behavior.
We describe a specific natural system, the Lux operon of Vibrio fischeri, which exhibits density dependent behavior using a well characterized set of genetic components. We have isolated, sequenced, and used these components to engineer intercellular communication mechanisms between living bacterial cells.
In combination with digitally controlled intracellular genetic circuits, we believe this work allows us to begin the more difficult process of using these communication mechanisms to perform directed engineering of multicellular structures, using techniques such as chemical diffusion dependent behavior. These same techniques form an essential part of our toolkit for engineering with life, and are widely applicable in the field of microbial robotics, with potential applications in medicine, environmental monitoring and control, engineered crop cultivation, and molecular scale fabrication.
KeywordsGenetic Circuit LuxI Gene Unreliable Component LuxR Protein Amorphous Computing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.H Abelson, D Allen, D Coore, C Hanson, G Homsy, TF Knight, R Nagpal, E Rauch, GJ sussman, and R Weiss, Amorphous computing, Tech. Report AI Memo No. 1665, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, 1999.Google Scholar
- 2.FM Ausubel, R Brent, RE Kingston, DD Moore, JG Seidman, JA Smith, and K Struhl, Short protocols in molecular biology, Wiley, 1999.Google Scholar
- 3.D Coore, Botanical computing: A developmental approach to generating interconnect topologies on an amorphous computer, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998.Google Scholar
- 4.D Coore, R Nagpal, and R Weiss, Paradigms for structure in an amorphous computing, Tech. Report AI Memo No. 1614, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, 1997.Google Scholar
- 5.T deKievit, PC Seed, J Nezezon, L Passador, and BH Iglewski, Rsal, a novel repressor of virulence gene expression in pseudomonas aeruginosa, J. Bacteriol 181 (1999), 2175–2184.Google Scholar
- 8.M Dworkin, Cell-cell interactions in the myxobacteria, Symp. Soc. Gen. Microbiol., vol. 25, 1973, pp. 135–147.Google Scholar
- 14.C Fuqua and A Eberhard, Signal generation in autoinduction systems: synthesis of acylated homoserine lactones by LuxI-type proteins, 211–230, GM Dunny and Winans, Washington, DC, 1999, pp. 211–230.Google Scholar
- 15.WC Fuqua, S Winans, and EP Greenberg, Quorum sensing in bacteria: The luxr-luxi family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators, J. Bacteriol 176 (1994), 269–275.Google Scholar
- 17.KM Gray and EP Greenberg, Sequencing and analysis of luxr and luxi, the luminescence regulatory genes from the squid light organ symbiont vibrio fischeri es114, Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, vol. 1, 1992, GENBANK M96844 (strain ES114), pp. 414–419.Google Scholar
- 18.EP Greenberg, Quorum sensing in gram-negative bacteria, ASM News, vol. 63, 1997, pp. 371–377.Google Scholar
- 19.Thomas F. Knight Jr. and Gerald Jay Sussman, Cellular gate technology, First International Conference on Unconventional Models of Computation (CS Calude, J Casti, and MJ Dinneen, eds.), Springer-Verlag, 1998, pp. 257–272.Google Scholar
- 20.D Kaiser, Regulation of multicellular development in myxobacteria, Microbial Development (1984), 197–218.Google Scholar
- 21.TF Knight and N Papadakis, Vibrio fischeri lux operon sali digest, GENBANK AF170104 (strain MJ-1), 1999.Google Scholar
- 24.R Nagpal, Organizing a global coordinate system from local information on an amorphous computer, Tech. Report AI Memo No. 1666, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, 1999.Google Scholar
- 26.E Rauch, Discrete, amorphous physical models, Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1999.Google Scholar
- 28.AM Stevens and EP Greenberg, Transcriptional activation by luxr, in cell-cell signaling in bacteria, Cell-Cell Signaling in Bacteria (GM Dunny and Winans, eds.), American Society for Microbiology, 1999.Google Scholar
- 29.Ron Weiss and George Homsy, Toward in-vivo digital circuits, Dimacs Workshop on Evolution as Computation (Princeton, NJ), January 1999.Google Scholar
- 30.Ron Weiss, George Homsy, and Radhika Nagpal, Programming biological cells, Eighth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Wild and Crazy Ideas Session (San Jose, California), October 1998.Google Scholar
- 31.MR Winfrey, MA Rott, and AT Wortman, Unraveling dna: Molecular biology for the laboratory, Prentice Hall, 1997.Google Scholar