Advertisement

Properties of Brownian Image Models in Scale-Space

  • Kim S. Pedersen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2695)

Abstract

In this paper it is argued that the Brownian image model is the least committed, scale invariant, statistical image model which describes the second order statistics of natural images. Various properties of three different types of Gaussian image models (white noise, Brownian and fractional Brownian images) will be discussed in relation to linear scale-space theory, and it will be shown empirically that the second order statistics of natural images mapped into jet space may, within some scale interval, be modeled by the Brownian image model. This is consistent with the 1/f 2 power spectrum law that apparently governs natural images. Furthermore, the distribution of Brownian images mapped into jet space is Gaussian and an analytical expression can be derived for the covariance matrix of Brownian images in jet space. This matrix is also a good approximation of the covariance matrix of natural images in jet space. The consequence of these results is that the Brownian image model can be used as a least committed model of the covariance structure of the distribution of natural images.

Keywords

White Noise Gaussian White Noise Natural Image Stochastic Function Spatial Covariance Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Blom, B.M. ter Haar Romeny, A. Bel, and J.J. Koenderink. Spatial derivatives and the propagation of noise in Gaussian scale space. J. Vis. Comm. & Im. Repr., 4(1):1–13, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Z. Chi. Construction of stationary self-similar generalized fields by random wavelet expansion. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 121(2), 269–300 2001.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. J. Field. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J. Optic. Soc. of Am., 4(12):2379–2394, 1987.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Florack. Image Structure. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. M. Florack, B. M. ter Haar Romeny, J. J. Koenderink, and M. A. Viergever. Linear scale-space. Journal of Math. Imaging and Vision, 4(4):325–351, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Friedlander and M. Joshi. Introduction to The Theory of Distributions. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    U. Grenander and A. Srivastava. Probability models for clutter in natural images. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23(4):424–429, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Huang and D. Mumford. Statistics of natural images and models. In Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. T. Jaynes. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical review, 106(4):620–630, 1957.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. J. Koenderink. The structure of images. Biol. Cybern., 50:363–370, 1984.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. J. Koenderink and A. J. van Doorn. Representation of local geometry in the visual system. Biological Cybernetics, 55:367–375, 1987.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. A. Lifshits. Gaussian Random Functions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Lindeberg. Feature detection with automatic scale selection. International Journal of Computer Vision, 30(2):79–116, November 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Majer. Self-similarity of noise in scale-space. In Proc. of Scale-Space’99, LNCS 1682, pages 423–428. Springer Verlag, 1999.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Mallat. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation. IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 11(7):674–693, July 1989.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. B. Mandelbrot and J. W. van Ness. Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications. SIAM Review, 10(4):422–437, October 1968.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Mumford. The statistical description of visual signals. In ICIAM’95, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Mumford and B. Gidas. Stochastic models for generic images. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 59(11):85–111, March 2001.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Nielsen and M. Lillholm. What do features tell about images? In Proc. of Scale-Space’01, LNCS 2106, pages 39–50. Springer, 2001.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    B. Øksendal. Stochastic Differential Equations. Springer, 5 edition, 2000.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    K. S. Pedersen and A. B. Lee. Toward a full probability model of edges in natural images. In Proc. of 7th ECCV, LNCS 2350, pages 328–342. Springer Verlag, 2002.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    K. S. Pedersen and M. Nielsen. The Hausdorff dimension and scale-space normalisation of natural images. J. Vis. Comm. & Im. Rep., 11(2):266–277, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. P. Pentland. Fractal-based description of natural scenes. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6(6):661–674, November 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. L. Ruderman and W. Bialek. Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods. Physical Review Letters, 73(6):814–817, August 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. Srivastava, X. Liu, and U. Grenander. Universal analytical forms for modeling image probabilities. IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 24(9):1200–1214, September 2002.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. H. van Hateren and A. van der Schaaf. Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Series B, 265:359–366, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim S. Pedersen
    • 1
  1. 1.DIKUUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations