Approaching Wordnets through a Structural Point of View

  • Dimitris Avramidis
  • Maria Kyriakopoulou
  • Manolis Tzagarakis
  • Sofia Stamou
  • Dimitris Christodoulakis
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2641)

Abstract

The analogy of a semantic network to hypertext has long been recognized, and semantic networks have been considered as a logical model of hypertext — especially for those hypertexts with typed nodes and links. Moreover, wordnets form the most representative type of semantic networks in the field of Natural Language Processing and semantics in particular. It is obvious that hypertext and wordnets share many common points regarding their fundamental principles and the objectives towards which they both aim. This paper expresses our initial thoughts towards incorporating the Balkan WordNet in Callimachus CB-OHS, as such systems can conveniently support structure. We strongly believe that such task can be fulfilled by using already implemented domain abstractions along with a new set of behaviors.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bucka-Lassen, D., Pedersen, C. Å., and Reinert, Ó. H. 1998. Cooperative Authoring Using Open Spatial Hypermedia. M.S. Thesis, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bush, Vanevar. 1945. As we may think. Atlantic Monthly (Jul), 101–108.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Conklin, J. and Begeman, M. L. 1987. gIBIS: a hypertext tool for team design deliberation. Proceedings of the 1987 ACM Conference on Hypertext (Chapel Hill, NC), ACM Press, 247–251.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Conklin, J. 1987. Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer 20(9), 17–41.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Evens, M. W. (Ed.) 1988. Relational models of the lexicon: Representing knowledge in semantic networks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fellbaum, C. (Ed.) 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Halasz, F. G. 1987. Reflections on NoteCards: Seven issues for the next generation of hypermedia systems. Proceedings of the 1987 ACM Conference on Hypertext (Chapel Hill, NC), ACM Press, 345–365.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hasan, R. 1984. Coherence and cohesive harmony. Understanding Reading Comprehension (J. Flood, Ed.), IRA, Newark, DE.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jing, Y. and Croft, W. B. 1994. An association thesaurus for information retrieval. Proceedings of RIAO-94, 4 th International Conference “Recherche d’Information Assistee par Ordinateur” (New York, NY), 146–160.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kay, M. 1989. The concrete lexicon and the abstract dictionary. Proceedings of the 5 th Annual Conference of the UW Center for the New Oxford English Dictionary (Waterloo, ON), 35–41.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kyriakopoulou, M., Avramidis, D., Vaitis, M., Tzagarakis, M., and Christodoulakis, D. 2001. Broadening structural computing systems towards hypermedia development. Proceedings of the 3 rd International Workshop on Structural Computing (Århus, Denmark), Springer Verlag, 131–140.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Landow, G. P. 1987. Relationally encoded links and the rhetoric of hypertext. Proceedings of the 1987 ACM Conference on Hypertext (Chapel Hill, NC), ACM Press, 331–343.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leggett, J. J., and Schnase, J. L. 1994. Viewing Dexter with open eyes. Communications of the ACM 37(2), ACM Press, 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lehmann, F. W. 1992. Semantic networks in artificial intelligence. Semantic Networks (F. W. Lehmann, Ed.), Pergamon Press Ltd., 1–50.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marshall, C. C., Shipman, F. M., and Coombs, J. H. 1994. VIKI: Spatial hypertext supporting emergent structure. Proceedings of the 1994 ACM European Conference on Hypermedia Technology (Edinburgh, Scotland), ACM Press, 13–23.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marshall, C. C. 1987. Exploring representation problems using hypertext. Proceedings of the 1987 ACM Conference on Hypertext (Chapel Hill, NC), ACM Press, 253–268.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Millard, D. E., Moreau, L., Davis, H. C., and Reich, S. 2000. FOHM: A fundamental open hypertext model for investigating interoperability between hypertext domains. Proceedings of the 11 th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (San Antonio, TX), ACM Press, 93–102.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miller, G. A. 1998. Nouns in WordNet. In [6], 23–46.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nelson, T. H. 1974. Computer Lib / Dream Machines, Tempus Books of Microsoft Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nürnberg, P. J., Leggett, J. J., and Wiil, U. K. 1998. An agenda for open hypermedia research. Proceedings of the 9 th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (Pittsburgh, PA), ACM Press, 198–206.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nürnberg, P. J., Leggett, J. J., and Schneider, E. R. 1997. As we should have thought. Proceedings of the 8 th ACM Hypertext Conference (Southampton, UK), 96–101. ACM Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nürnberg, P. J., Leggett, J. J., Schneider, E. R., and Schnase, J. L. 1996. HOSS: A new paradigm for computing. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Hypertext Conference (Washington, DC, Mar), ACM Press, 194–202.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parunak, H. V. D. 1991. Don’t link me in: Set based hypermedia for taxonomic reasoning. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Hypertext (Hypertext’ 91) (San Antonio, TX), 233–242.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Priss, U. 1998. The formalization of WordNet by methods of relational concept analysis. In [6], 179–196.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tzagarakis, M., Avramidis, D., Kyriakopoulou, M., schraefel, m. c., Vaitis, M., and Christodoulakis, D. 2002. Structuring primitives in the Callimachus component-based open hypermedia system. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 25(4) (Oct).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wiil, U. K., and Nurnberg, P. J. 1999. Evolving hypermedia middleware services: Lessons and observations. Proceedings of the 1999 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (San Antonio, TX), ACM Press, 427–436.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dimitris Avramidis
    • 1
  • Maria Kyriakopoulou
    • 1
  • Manolis Tzagarakis
    • 2
  • Sofia Stamou
    • 2
  • Dimitris Christodoulakis
    • 2
  1. 1.Computer Engineering and Informatics DepartmentUniversity of PatrasRion PatrasGreece
  2. 2.Research Academic Computer Technology InstitutePatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations