Pair-Programming Effect on Developers Productivity

  • Sven Heiberg
  • Uuno Puus
  • Priit Salumaa
  • Asko Seeba
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2675)

Abstract

This paper gives an overview of a pair-programming experiment designed to verify how pair-programming affects programmer’s technical productivity. The experiment took place at the Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu (UT), Estonia. The paper includes the problem statement, description of the experimental design, the experiment results, and a discussion about the validity of the results. During the experiment pair-programming worked well in getting early testable programming results, pair-programmers and non-pair-programmers performed with similar final results.

Keywords

Practice Session Technical Productivity Technical Question Experiment Team Developer Productivity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Campell, Donald T.; Stanley, Julian C., Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research, Houghton Mifflin College, 1966.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cockburn, Alistair; Williams, Laurie; The Costs and Benefits of Pair Programming, XP2000, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Costa, P. T., Jr., McCrae, R. R., Normal Personality Assessment in Clinical Practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5–13, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hettmansperger, Thomas P., Statistical Inference Based on Ranks, John Wiley & Sons, 1984Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nawrocki J.; Wojciechowski, A., Experimental Evaluation of Pair Programming, in: K. Maxwell, S. Oligny, R. Kusters, E. van Veenendaal (eds.), Project Control: Satisfying the Customer, Shaker Publishing 2001, ESCOM 2001, 2–4 April 2001 London, 269–276.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nosek, T. John; The case for collaborative programming, Communications of the ACM, vol. 41 (1998), No. 3, 105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ray, William J; Methods Toward a Science of Behavior and Experience, Wadsworth Thomson Learning, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Williams, Laurie; Kessler, R. Robert; All I Really Need to Know about Pair Programming I Learned in Kindergarten, Communications of the ACM, 2000.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Williams, Laurie; Kessler, Robert R.; Cunningham, Ward; Jeffries, Ron; Strengthening the Case for Pair Programming, IEEE Software, 2000.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Williams, Laurie; Kessler, R. Robert; Experimenting with Industry’s “Pair-Programming” Model in the Computer Science Classroom, Journal on Software Engineering Education, 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Williams, Laurie; The Collaborative Software Process, University of Utah, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wilson, D. Judith; Hoskin, Nathan; Nosek, T. John; The benefits of collaboration for student programmers, Proceedings of the twenty-fourth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 1993, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States pp. 160 164.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sven Heiberg
    • 1
    • 2
  • Uuno Puus
    • 1
    • 2
  • Priit Salumaa
    • 1
  • Asko Seeba
    • 3
    • 2
  1. 1.University of TartuTartu
  2. 2.CyberneticaEstonia
  3. 3.Helsinki University of TechnologyHelsinki

Personalised recommendations