Perception-Based Illumination Information Measurement and Light Source Placement

  • Pere-Pau Vázquez
  • Mateu Sbert
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2669)

Abstract

The automatic selection of good viewing parameters is very complex. In most cases, the notion of good strongly depends on the concrete application. Moreover, when an intuitive definition of good view is available, it is often difficult to establish a measure that brings it to the practice. Commonly, two kind of viewing parameters must be set: the position and orientation of the camera, and the ones relative to light sources. The first ones will determine how much of the geometry can be captured and the latter will influence on how much of it is revealed (i. e. illuminated) to the user. In this paper we will define a metric to calculate the amount of information relative to an object that is communicated to the user given a fixed camera position. This measure is based on an information-based concept, the Shannon entropy, and will be applied to the problem of automatic selection of light positions in order to adequately illuminate an object.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    C. Colin. Automatic computation of a scene’s good views. In Proc. MICAD, February 1990.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    T. Kamada and S. Kawai. A simple method for computing general position in displaying three-dimensional objects. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 41(1):43–56, January 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. Plemenos and M. Benayada. Intelligent display in scene modeling. new techniques to automatically compute good views. In Proc. International Conference GRAPHICON’96, July 1996.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    P. Barral, G. Dorme, and D. Plemenos. Scene understanding techniques using a virtual camera. In A. de Sousa and J.C. Torres, editors, Proc. Eurographics’00, short presentations, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    P.-P. Vázquez, M. Feixas, M. Sbert, and W. Heidrich. Viewpoint selection using viewpoint entropy. In T. Ertl, B. Girod, G. Greiner H. Niemann, and H.-P. Seidel, editors, Proceedings of the Vision Modeling and Visualization Conference (VMV-01), pages 273–280, Stuttgart, November 21–23 2001. IOS Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. E. Blahut. Principles and Practice of Information Theory. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA, 1987.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    P.-P. Vázquez, M. Feixas, M. Sbert, and A. Llobet. Viewpoint entropy: A new tool for obtaining good views for molecules. In D. Ebert, P. Brunet, and I. Navazo, editors, Data Visualisation 2002 (Eurographics/IEEE TCVG Symposium Proceedings). Eurographics/IEEE, May 27–29 2002.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Y. Takeuchi and N. Ohnishi. Active vision system based on information theory. Systems and Computers in Japan, 29 (11):31–39, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    G. Patow and X. Pueyo. A survey on inverse rendering problems. Technical Report IIiA 00-07-RR, IIiA, University of Girona, 2000.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    C. Schoeneman, J. Dorsey, B. Smits, J. Arvo, and D. Greenberg. Painting with light. In James T. Kajiya, editor, SIGGRAPH 93 Conference Proceedings, Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, pages 143–146. ACM SIGGRAPH, ACM Press, August 1993.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. K. Kawai, J. S. Painter, and M. F. Cohen. Radioptimization-goal based rendering. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH-93: Computer Graphics, pages 147–154, Anaheim, CA, 1993.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Cardoso Costa, A. Augusto de Sousa, and F. Nunus Ferreira. Lighting design: A goal based approach using optimization. In Rendering Techniques’ 99, pages 317–328, New York, NY, 1999. Springer Wien.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    P. Poulin and A. Fournier. Lights from highlights and shadows. Computer Graphics, 25(2):31–38, March 1992.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    P. Poulin, K. Ratib, and M. Jacques. Sketching shadows and highlights to position lights. In Proceedings of Computer Graphics International 97, pages 56–63. IEEE Computer Society, June 1997.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    V. Jolivet, D. Plemenos, and P. Poulingeas. Inverse direct lighting with a Monte Carlo method and declarative modelling. 2330:3–--, 2002.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. Marks, B. Andalman, P. A. Beardsley, W. Freeman, S. Gibson, J. Hodgins, T. Kang, B. Mirtich, H. Pfister, W. Ruml, K. Ryall, J. Seims, and S. Shieber. Design galleries: A general approach to setting parameters for computer graphics and animation. In T. Whitted, editor, SIGGRAPH 97 Conference Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, pages 389–400. ACM SIGGRAPH, Addison Wesley, August 1997. ISBN 0-89791-896-7.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    S. Gumhold. Maximum entropy light source placement. In Proc. of the Visualization 2002 Conference, pages 275–282. IEEE Computer Society Press, October 2002.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    R. Shacked and D. Lischinski. Automatic lighting design using a perceptual quality metric. In Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Eurographics 2001), volume 20, pages C-215–C-226, September 2001.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    L. Neumann, K. Matkovic, and W. Purgathofer. Perception based color image difference. Computer Graphics Forum, 17(3):233–241, September 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    J. Kautz, P.-P. Vázquez, W. Heidrich, and H.-P. Seidel. A Unified Approach to Prefiltered Environment Maps. In B. Peroche and H. Rushmeier, editors, Eleventh Eurographics Rendering Workshop 2000, pages 185–196. Eurographics, June 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pere-Pau Vázquez
    • 1
  • Mateu Sbert
    • 2
  1. 1.Campus Sud — Ed. ETSEIBDept. LSI — Universitat Politècnica de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Campus Montilivi, EPSIIiA, Universitat de GironaGironaSpain

Personalised recommendations